2,011
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
7 collections
    7
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How open science helps researchers succeed.

      eLife
      none, open access, open data, open science, open source, research

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references151

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Investigating Variation in Replicability

          Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects – flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification – did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

            P O Seglen (1997)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

              P O Seglen (1997)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                27387362
                10.7554/eLife.16800

                none,open access,open data,open science,open source,research
                none, open access, open data, open science, open source, research

                Comments

                wrote:

                This article shows well the benefits for open science that are not that obvious. One would not expect these, so it is nice that this article can give evidence for these facts, to give more confidence to scientist that want to openly publish their article. However, I can still see that the financial benefits of publishing for a writer can go beyond these advantages, and that financial security also plays a big role when it comes to scientists who just started their carreers. 

                 

                2019-04-18 14:52 UTC
                +1
                One person recommends this

                Comment on this article