27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      RISK MODEL FOR ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Energy performance contracting provides guaranteed minimum energy savings to building owners, enabling them to finance project costs using utility savings over the duration of the project. This has been an attractive project delivery method for organizations with reduced budgets for capital projects, particularly among correctional facilities which frequently have lengthy periods of deferred maintenance and ongoing building operations and maintenance concerns. This research builds on a previously developed project factors risk framework for energy service companies undertaking building retrofits. This paper proposes a risk analysis and evaluation model that includes quantitative, expert-based, and probabilistically derived information. Expected cost was used to evaluate risks over lengthy project life cycles and a new metric was developed for use in the model—expected life cycle value. Model results reveal that the most critical risk factors relate to the reduced availability of “low-hanging fruit” energy conservation measures, work scopes based on traditional design-bid-build procurement, unavailable or inaccurate facility information, facility age and current code requirements, and conducting the investment grade audit too quickly. The life cycle cost-based risk model employed in this paper is proposed as an advancement over traditional risk management methods, and it is expected to be applicable, with modification, across other municipal and state government subdomains, especially high security projects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On The Quantitative Definition of Risk

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jgrb
                Journal of Green Building
                College Publishing
                1552-6100
                1943-4618
                1943-4618
                Spring 2019
                : 14
                : 2
                : 61-82
                Author notes

                1. Assistant Professor of Construction Management, Michigan State University School of Planning, Design, and Construction (corresponding author)— berghorn@ 123456msu.edu

                2. Professor of Construction Management, Michigan State University School of Planning, Design, and Construction— syalm@ 123456msu.edu

                Article
                jgb.14.2.61
                10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.61
                ceb5ab02-6603-407d-8cc0-91610f4776b7
                © 2019 College Publishing
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 22
                Categories
                RESEARCH

                Urban design & Planning,Civil engineering,Environmental management, Policy & Planning,Architecture,Environmental engineering
                project performance risks,building retrofits,energy efficient building practices,energy performance contracting (EPC),risk modeling,scenario failure mode and effect analysis (SFMEA)

                Comments

                Comment on this article