80
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Background Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. Methods This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions. Results Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence. Conclusion Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.

          Despite numerous advances, chronic and other difficult-to-manage wounds continue to be a treatment challenge. Presented is a new subatmospheric pressure technique: vacuum-assisted closure (The V.A.C.). The V.A.C. technique entails placing an open-cell foam dressing into the wound cavity and applying a controlled subatmospheric pressure (125 mmHg below ambient pressure). Three hundred wounds were treated: 175 chronic wounds, 94 subacute wounds, and 31 acute wounds. Two hundred ninety-six wounds responded favorably to subatmospheric pressure treatment, with an increased rate of granulation tissue formation. Wounds were treated until completely closed, were covered with a split-thickness skin graft, or a flap was rotated into the health, granulating would bed. The technique removes chronic edema, leading to increased localized blood flow, and the applied forces result in the enhanced formation of granulation tissue. Vacuum-assisted closure is an extremely efficacious modality for treating chronic and difficult wounds.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures.

            To investigate negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent wound dehiscence and infection after high-risk lower extremity trauma. Prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Four Level I trauma centers. Blunt trauma patients with one of three high-risk fracture types (tibial plateau, pilon, calcaneus) requiring surgical stabilization. Incisional NPWT (Group B) was applied to the closed surgical incisions of patients randomized to the study arm of this trial, whereas standard postoperative dressings (Group A) were applied to the control patients. Acute and chronic wound dehiscence and infection. Two hundred forty-nine patients with 263 fractures have enrolled in this study with 122 randomized to Group A (controls) and 141 to Group B (NPWT). There was no difference between the groups in the distribution of calcaneus (39%), pilon (17%), or tibial plateau (44%) fractures. There were a total of 23 infections in Group A and 14 in Group B, which represented a significant difference in favor of NPWT (P = 0.049). The relative risk of developing an infection was 1.9 times higher in control patients than in patients treated with NPWT (95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.55). There have been no studies evaluating incisional NPWT as a prophylactic treatment to prevent infection and wound dehiscence of high-risk surgical incisions. Our data demonstrate that there is a decreased incidence of wound dehiscence and total infections after high-risk fractures when patients have NPWT applied to their surgical incisions after closure. There is also a strong trend for decreases in acute infections after NPWT. Based on our data in this multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial, NPWT should be considered for high-risk wounds after severe skeletal trauma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                British Journal of Surgery
                Br J Surg
                Wiley
                00071323
                April 2016
                April 2016
                March 16 2016
                : 103
                : 5
                : 477-486
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Plastic Surgery; Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Clinical Research, Research Unit of Plastic Surgery; Odense Denmark
                [2 ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Clinical Research, Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; Odense Denmark
                [3 ]Institute of Clinical Medicine; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
                [4 ]Centre for Health Economics Research (COHERE); University of Southern Denmark; Odense Denmark
                [5 ]Division of Surgery; University College London, Northwick Park Institute of Medical Research Campus; London UK
                Article
                10.1002/bjs.10084
                6f4bfd7a-9ecd-4b2a-a916-163cf82e0499
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article