77
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains †

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Even in the absence of an experimental effect, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series generally demonstrate serial dependence. This colored noise or endogenous autocorrelation typically has disproportionate spectral power at low frequencies, i.e., its spectrum is f 1 ‐like. Various pre‐whitening and pre‐coloring strategies have been proposed to make valid inference on standardised test statistics estimated by time series regression in this context of residually autocorrelated errors. Here we introduce a new method based on random permutation after orthogonal transformation of the observed time series to the wavelet domain. This scheme exploits the general whitening or decorrelating property of the discrete wavelet transform and is implemented using a Daubechies wavelet with four vanishing moments to ensure exchangeability of wavelet coefficients within each scale of decomposition. For f 1 ‐like or fractal noises, e.g., realisations of fractional Brownian motion (fBm) parameterised by Hurst exponent 0 < H < 1, this resampling algorithm exactly preserves wavelet‐based estimates of the second order stochastic properties of the (possibly nonstationary) time series. Performance of the method is assessed empirically using f 1 ‐like noise simulated by multiple physical relaxation processes, and experimental fMRI data. Nominal type 1 error control in brain activation mapping is demonstrated by analysis of 13 images acquired under null or resting conditions. Compared to autoregressive pre‐whitening methods for computational inference, a key advantage of wavelet resampling seems to be its robustness in activation mapping of experimental fMRI data acquired at 3 Tesla field strength. We conclude that wavelet resampling may be a generally useful method for inference on naturally complex time series. Hum. Brain Mapping 12:61–78, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          An Introduction to the Bootstrap

          Statistics is a subject of many uses and surprisingly few effective practitioners. The traditional road to statistical knowledge is blocked, for most, by a formidable wall of mathematics. The approach in An Introduction to the Bootstrap avoids that wall. It arms scientists and engineers, as well as statisticians, with the computational techniques they need to analyze and understand complicated data sets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                etb23@cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Hum Brain Mapp
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
                HBM
                Human Brain Mapping
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (New York )
                1065-9471
                1097-0193
                13 December 2000
                February 2001
                : 12
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<>1.0.CO;2-N )
                : 61-78
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [ 2 ]Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [ 3 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [ 4 ]Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, United Kingdom
                [ 5 ]Guy's, King's and St Thomas's Medical School, London, United Kingdom
                [ 6 ]FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Brain Mapping Unit, Dept Psychiatry (Box 255), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
                Article
                PMC6871881 PMC6871881 6871881 HBM1004
                10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<61::AID-HBM1004>3.0.CO;2-W
                6871881
                11169871
                e5854bc8-54c2-42a9-8195-f22de5381d7e
                Copyright © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
                History
                : 26 May 2000
                : 14 September 2000
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, References: 59, Pages: 18, Words: 11930
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Funded by: SmithKline Beecham
                Categories
                Article
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2001
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.11.2019

                high field MRI,nonparametric,brain mapping,neuroimaging,fractional noise

                Comments

                Comment on this article