Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Clinical Trials as Topic, Guidelines as Topic, Health Services Research, standards, Humans, Observer Variation, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies. Eight experts in reliability and agreement investigation developed guidelines for reporting. Fifteen issues that should be addressed when reliability and agreement are reported are proposed. The issues correspond to the headings usually used in publications. The proposed guidelines intend to improve the quality of reporting. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      21130355
      10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002

      Comments

      Comment on this article