12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic significance of combined radiologic imaging modalities for prognosis of clinical IA adenocarcinomas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We previously proposed measuring tumor size using mediastinal window setting on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) as a simple and useful modality for preoperative prognostication of small adenocarcinoma. Hence, the importance of tumor volume and positron emission tomography (PET) for preoperative prognostication of clinical stage IA (cIA) adenocarcinoma was studied.

          Materials and Methods

          We retrospectively evaluated total 324 patients who underwent pulmonary resection of cIA adenocarcinoma between July 2008 and August 2015. Reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) images from 1–1.5 mm-sliced CT were evaluated for whole tumor volume including ground grass opacity, consolidation volume on lung window setting, and mediastinal window volume (MWV). The values examined by PET were total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and maximum standardized uptake (SUV max) and mean. Pathologic status was evaluated according to tumor maximum size, invasive size (IS), lymphatic and vascular vessels, pleural invasion (ly/v/pl), and TNM staging.

          Results

          According to ly/v/pl invasion and lymph node positivity, no variables were superior to IS. We used Mean/MWV (SUV mean x MWV) to evaluate tumor quality and quantity in the role of surrogate TLG. Mean/MWV were superior to IS. Additionally, Mean/MV was associated with lymph node metastases. Among the various histologic subtypes, solid-predominant had the highest expression of Mean/MV. The higher Mean/MV significantly contributed to unfavorable disease-free survival in cIA adenocarcinomas, but not to overall survival.

          Conclusions

          The mean/MWV value determination on 3D-reconstructed CT images was a simple and useful preoperative modality for predicting invasive facet in cIA adenocarcinoma. However, higher values didn't significantly affect overall survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis.

          Although there are many reported prognostic indicators for pulmonary adenocarcinoma, the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of early stage adenocarcinoma have not been evaluated fully, except for several studies of nonmucinous and sclerosing bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Two hundred thirty-six surgically resected small peripheral adenocarcinomas measuring 2 cm or less in greatest dimension were reviewed using a simple histologic classification of six types based on tumor growth patterns. Type A (localized bronchioloalveolar carcinoma [LBAC]) (n = 14) revealed replacement growth of alveolar-lining epithelial cells with a relatively thin stroma. In type B (LBAC with foci of structural collapse of alveoli) (n = 14), fibrotic foci due to alveolar collapse were observed in tumors of LBAC. Type C (LBAC with foci of active fibroblastic proliferation) (n = 141) was the largest group in this study, and foci of active fibroblastic proliferation were evident. Type D (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma), type E (tubular adenocarcinoma) and type F (papillary adenocarcinoma with a compressive growth pattern) (n = 61) showed compressive and expanding growth. Types A and B showed no lymph node metastasis and the most favorable prognosis (100% 5-year survival) of the six types. Histologic types A and B are thought to be in situ peripheral adenocarcinoma, whereas type C appears to be an advanced stage of types A and B. Conversely, types D, E, and F are small advanced adenocarcinomas with a less favorable prognosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project.

              The 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is an imaging tool for assessing clinical tumor, node, metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) has been studied as a potential prognostic factor for survival. However, the sample sizes are limited leading to conduct a meta-analysis to improve the precision in estimating its effect. We performed a systematic literature search. For each publication, we extracted an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing patients with a low and a high SUV and we aggregated the individual HRs into a combined HR, using a random-effects model. We found 13 eligible studies dedicated to NSCLC. Most of them included patients with stages I to III/IV and used a SUV assessment corrected for body weight. Number of patients ranged from 38 to 315 (total: 1474); 11 studies identified a high SUV as a poor prognostic factor for survival although two studies found no significant correlation between SUV and survival. SUV measurement and SUV threshold for defining high SUV were study dependent, eight studies looked for a so-called best cutoff (maximizing the logrank test statistic) without adjusting the p value for multiplicity. Overall, the combined HR for the 13 reports was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70-3.02); excluding the studies proposing a "best" cutoff, it was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.431-3.04). Our meta-analysis suggests that the primary tumor SUV measurement has a prognostic value in NSCLC; these results should be confirmed in a meta-analysis on individual patients' data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Oncotarget
                Oncotarget
                Oncotarget
                ImpactJ
                Oncotarget
                Impact Journals LLC
                1949-2553
                13 February 2018
                18 December 2017
                : 9
                : 12
                : 10745-10753
                Affiliations
                1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
                2 Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
                3 East Nagoya Radiological Diagnosis Foundation, Aichi, Japan
                4 Department of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Hiroaki Kuroda, h-kuroda@ 123456aichi-cc.jp .
                Article
                23395
                10.18632/oncotarget.23395
                5828228
                29535840
                001475ba-d998-4158-8bca-06c4e579fab6
                Copyright: © 2018 Kuroda et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 September 2016
                : 12 November 2017
                Categories
                Clinical Research Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                three-dimensional,mediastinal size,invasive size,positron emission tomography,adenocarcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article