36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The optimal choice of chemotherapy regimens for patients with relapsed platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancer — protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Highlights

          This protocol will provide the basic method to conduct the network meta-analysis of relapsed platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancer. And when the article finished, it will assess the efficacy and safety of different second line chemotherapy drugs including single and combined chemotherapy regiments and targeted therapy to provide more evidence to clinicians.

          Abstract

          Objectiv e: Debulking surgery (residual disease of less than 1 cm) followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy is the current standard therapy for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma and primary fallopian cancer. But the prognosis remains poor. Several chemotherapy regimens could be selected for patients with recrudescent cancer. However, the standard second chemotherapy regimen remains a subject of debate. The purpose of our study is to carry out a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different regimens for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer based on existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and analysis : Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Cochrane Library databases, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and ClinicalTrials.gov will be systematically searched for eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) on chemotherapy, immune therapy, biological therapy, targeted therapy for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with multiple outcome measures will be included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes are overall survival and median survival time. The secondary outcomes include the safety and side effects of these regimens. Direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to compare different regimens. Conclusion : The results of this network meta-analysis will provide direct and indirect evidence of treatments for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and it may provide a ranking of the chemotherapy regimens for patients and gynecological oncologists to help them select the best option.

          Translated abstract

          目的 上皮性卵巢癌、原发性腹膜癌、输卵管癌预后较差,减瘤术联合紫杉醇加铂类化疗是目前的首选方案。由于其二线化疗方案的选择较多,目前并无标准首选方案, 本计划书将对应用网状meta分析对铂类耐药的卵巢癌二线化疗方案的优化选择进行先期计划。 方法 选取 Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Cochrane Library databases, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库进行文献检索。纳入复发耐药型卵巢癌化疗,免疫治疗,生物治疗,靶向治疗的随机对照试验。应用 Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 评估纳入的文献质量。主要观察指标为:中位生存期和整体生存率。次要观察指标为:有效性和安全性方面的评价。应用直接meta分析与间接meta分析(应用network meta-analysis (NMA) )进行数据统计。 结论 应用network meta分析,对复发性铂类耐药的随机对照试验提供的数据进行直接和间接比较,将可能对试验涉及的多种治疗方案的效果和安全性进行优化排序,为临床医师在实际工作中提供建议。

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know.

              The objectives of this article are to review the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline, version 1.1, highlighting the major changes in the new version compared with the original RECIST guideline (version 1.0), and to present case examples with representative imaging. Familiarity with the revised RECIST is essential in day-to-day oncologic imaging practice to provide up-to-date service to oncologists and their patients. Some of the changes in the revised RECIST affect how radiologists select, measure, and report target lesions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Traditional Medicine Research
                TMR Integrative Medicine
                TMR Editorial Board (Jintang road, 99, Hedong district Tianjin,China, 300170. )
                2413-3973
                July 2017
                10 July 2017
                : 2
                : 3
                : 30-36
                Affiliations
                [1-2413-3973-2-3-30] 1National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer institute and hospital, Tianjin, China.
                [2-2413-3973-2-3-30] 2Tianjin center for disease control and prevention, Tianjin Medical University Cancer institute and hospital, Tianjin, China.
                [3-2413-3973-2-3-30] 3Department of gynecology Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer institute and hospital, Tianjin, China.
                [4-2413-3973-2-3-30] 4Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
                [5-2413-3973-2-3-30] 5Department of pancreatic cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer institute and hospital, Tianjin, China.
                Author notes
                #Correspondence to: Yong Tang, tli001@ 123456163.com. Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, He Xi District, Tianjin 300060, China.
                *co-first author
                Abbreviations: PTX, paclitaxel; OS, Overall survival.
                Funding: This study was supported by Tianjin Health Bureau foundation (2013KZ089),Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (B1212). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
                Copyright: © 2017 Liu FH et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                Executive Editor: Jian Hao, Xiao-dong Wang.
                Article
                2413-3973-2-3-30
                10.12032/TMRIM201701114
                00553c90-fb4b-4746-8f5c-4af445da83b3

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 25 July 2016
                Categories
                Orginal Article
                Medicine
                Traditional Medicine

                Medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Health & Social care,Complementary & Alternative medicine
                Protocol,Network meta-analysis,Chemotherapy,Epithelial ovarian cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article