3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Attitudes toward Lesbians, Gay Men, and Their Rights in a Sample of Ecuadorian Cisgender Men and Women

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept

          R. Connell (2005)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis.

            This meta-analysis surveyed 177 usable sources that reported data on gender differences on 21 different measures of sexual attitudes and behaviors. The largest gender difference was in incidence of masturbation: Men had the greater incidence (d = .96). There was also a large gender difference in attitudes toward casual sex: Males had considerably more permissive attitudes (d = .81). There were no gender differences in attitudes toward homosexuality or in sexual satisfaction. Most other gender differences were in the small-to-moderate range. Gender differences narrowed from the 1960s to the 1980s for many variables. Chodorow's neoanalytic theory, sociobiology, social learning theory, social role theory, and script theory are discussed in relation to these findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: the role of religion and cultural context.

              Across the globe, the debate over homosexuality continues, with great variation in public opinion about the acceptability of homosexuality, laws regulating same-sex unions and penalties for homosexual sex behaviors. Religion is often seen as an important predictor of attitudes about homosexuality. However, cross-national differences in cultural orientations suggest that the role religion has in explaining homosexual attitudes may depend on a nation's cultural context. In this study, we merge ideas from cultural sociology and religious contextual effects to explain cross-national variation in public opinion about homosexuality. Using data from the fourth wave of the World Values Survey and Hierarchical Modeling techniques, we find support for the micro and macro effects of religion and a survival vs. self-expressive cultural orientation. Moreover, we find that personal religious beliefs have a greater effect on attitudes about homosexuality in countries like the United States, which have a strong self-expressive cultural orientation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Homosexuality
                Journal of Homosexuality
                Informa UK Limited
                0091-8369
                1540-3602
                July 20 2021
                : 1-22
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychology, Universidad De Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
                [2 ]Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, University of Ibagué, Ibagué, Colombia
                [3 ]William James Center for Research, ISPA University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal
                [4 ]Psychological Studies in Education and Well-being, National Pedagogic University, Mexico City, Mexico
                Article
                10.1080/00918369.2021.1948771
                34283008
                0055aadf-2c51-4b09-b62b-8181e2ed3a54
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article