99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Place and Cause of Death in Centenarians: A Population-Based Observational Study in England, 2001 to 2010

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Catherine J. Evans and colleagues studied how many and where centenarians in England die, their causes of death, and how these measures have changed from 2001 to 2010.

          Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

          Abstract

          Background

          Centenarians are a rapidly growing demographic group worldwide, yet their health and social care needs are seldom considered. This study aims to examine trends in place of death and associations for centenarians in England over 10 years to consider policy implications of extreme longevity.

          Methods and Findings

          This is a population-based observational study using death registration data linked with area-level indices of multiple deprivations for people aged ≥100 years who died 2001 to 2010 in England, compared with those dying at ages 80-99. We used linear regression to examine the time trends in number of deaths and place of death, and Poisson regression to evaluate factors associated with centenarians’ place of death. The cohort totalled 35,867 people with a median age at death of 101 years (range: 100–115 years). Centenarian deaths increased 56% (95% CI 53.8%–57.4%) in 10 years. Most died in a care home with (26.7%, 95% CI 26.3%–27.2%) or without nursing (34.5%, 95% CI 34.0%–35.0%) or in hospital (27.2%, 95% CI 26.7%–27.6%). The proportion of deaths in nursing homes decreased over 10 years (−0.36% annually, 95% CI −0.63% to −0.09%, p = 0.014), while hospital deaths changed little (0.25% annually, 95% CI −0.06% to 0.57%, p = 0.09). Dying with frailty was common with “old age” stated in 75.6% of death certifications. Centenarians were more likely to die of pneumonia (e.g., 17.7% [95% CI 17.3%–18.1%] versus 6.0% [5.9%–6.0%] for those aged 80–84 years) and old age/frailty (28.1% [27.6%–28.5%] versus 0.9% [0.9%–0.9%] for those aged 80–84 years) and less likely to die of cancer (4.4% [4.2%–4.6%] versus 24.5% [24.6%–25.4%] for those aged 80–84 years) and ischemic heart disease (8.6% [8.3%–8.9%] versus 19.0% [18.9%–19.0%] for those aged 80–84 years) than were younger elderly patients. More care home beds available per 1,000 population were associated with fewer deaths in hospital (PR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, p<0.001).

          Conclusions

          Centenarians are more likely to have causes of death certified as pneumonia and frailty and less likely to have causes of death of cancer or ischemic heart disease, compared with younger elderly patients. To reduce reliance on hospital care at the end of life requires recognition of centenarians’ increased likelihood to “acute” decline, notably from pneumonia, and wider provision of anticipatory care to enable people to remain in their usual residence, and increasing care home bed capacity.

          Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

          Editors’ Summary

          Background

          People who live to be more than 100 years old—centenarians—are congratulated and honored in many countries. In the UK, for example, the Queen sends a personal greeting to individuals on their 100th birthday. The number of UK residents who reach this notable milestone is increasing steadily, roughly doubling every 10 years. The latest Office of National Statistics (ONS) figures indicate that 13,350 centenarians were living in the UK in 2012 (20 centenarians per 100,000 people in the population) compared to only 7,740 in 2002. If current trends continue, by 2066 there may be more than half a million centenarians living in the UK. And similar increases in the numbers of centenarians are being seen in many other countries. The exact number of centenarians living worldwide is uncertain but is thought to be around 317,000 and is projected to rise to about 18 million by the end of this century.

          Why Was This Study Done?

          Traditional blessings often include the wish that the blessing’s recipient lives to be at least 100 years old. However, extreme longevity is associated with increasing frailty—declining physical function, increasing disability, and increasing vulnerability to a poor clinical outcome following, for example, an infection. Consequently, many centenarians require 24-hour per day care in a nursing home or a residential care home. Moreover, although elderly people, including centenarians, generally prefer to die in a home environment rather than a clinical environment, many centenarians end up dying in a hospital. To ensure that centenarians get their preferred end-of-life care, policy makers and clinicians need to know as much as possible about the health and social needs of this specific and unique group of elderly people. In this population-based observational study, the researchers examine trends in the place of death and factors associated with the place of death among centenarians in England over a 10-year period.

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?

          The researchers extracted information about the place and cause of death of centenarians in England between 2001 and 2010 from the ONS death registration database, linked these data with area level information on deprivation and care-home bed capacity, and analyzed the data statistically. Over the 10-year study period, 35,867 centenarians (mainly women, average age 101 years) died in England. The annual number of centenarian deaths increased from 2,823 in 2001 to 4,393 in 2010. Overall, three-quarters of centenarian death certificates stated “old age” as the cause of death. About a quarter of centenarians died in the hospital, a quarter died in a nursing home, and a third died in a care home without nursing; only one in ten centenarians died at home. The proportion of deaths in a nursing home increased slightly over the study period but there was little change in the number of hospital deaths. Compared with younger age groups (80–84 year olds), centenarians were more likely to die from pneumonia and “old age” and less likely to die from cancer and heart disease. Among centenarians, dying in the hospital was more likely to be reported to be associated with pneumonia or heart disease than with dementia; death in the hospital was also associated with having four or more contributing causes of death and with living in a deprived area. Finally, living in an area with a higher care-home bed capacity was associated with a lower risk of dying in the hospital.

          What Do These Findings Mean?

          These findings suggest that many centenarians have outlived death from the chronic diseases that are the common causes of death among younger groups of elderly people and that dying in the hospital is often associated with pneumonia. Overall, these findings suggest that centenarians are a group of people living with a risk of death from increasing frailty that is exacerbated by acute lung infection. The accuracy of these findings is likely to be affected by the quality of UK death certification data. Although this is generally high, the strength of some of the reported associations may be affected, for example, by the tendency of clinicians to record the cause of death in the very elderly as “old age” to provide some comfort to surviving relatives. Importantly, however, these findings suggest that care-home capacity and the provision of anticipatory care should be increased in England (and possibly in other countries) to ensure that more of the growing number of centenarians can end their long lives outside hospital.

          Additional Information

          Please access these websites via the online version of this summary at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001653.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home.

            Nursing homes are important providers of end-of-life care to persons with advanced dementia. We used data from the Minimum Data Set (June 1, 1994, to December 31, 1997) to identify persons 65 years and older who died with advanced dementia (n = 1609) and terminal cancer (n = 883) within 1 year of admission to any New York State nursing home. Variables from the Minimum Data Set assessment completed within 120 days of death were used to describe and compare the end-of-life experiences of these 2 groups. At nursing home admission, only 1.1% of residents with advanced dementia were perceived to have a life expectancy of less than 6 months; however, 71.0% died within that period. Before death, 55.1% of demented residents had a do-not-resuscitate order, and 1.4% had a do-not-hospitalize order. Nonpalliative interventions were common among residents dying with advanced dementia: tube feeding, 25.0%; laboratory tests, 49.2%; restraints, 11.2%; and intravenous therapy, 10.1%. Residents with dementia were less likely than those with cancer to have directives limiting care but were more likely to experience burdensome interventions: do-not-resuscitate order (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.16), do-not-hospitalize order (adjusted OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66), tube feeding (adjusted OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.51-3.23), laboratory tests (adjusted OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 2.01-3.18), and restraints (adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.23-2.61). Distressing conditions common in advanced dementia included pressure ulcers (14.7%), constipation (13.7%), pain (11.5%), and shortness of breath (8.2%). Nursing home residents dying with advanced dementia are not perceived as having a terminal condition, and most do not receive optimal palliative care. Management and educational strategies are needed to improve end-of-life care in advanced dementia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A national study of the location of death for older persons with dementia.

              To describe where older Americans with dementia die and to compare the state health system factors related to the location of dementia-related deaths with those of cancer and all other conditions in this population. Cross-sectional study. United States in 2001. All persons aged 65 and older who died from nontraumatic causes in the United States during 2001. The underlying cause of death, as determined by the National Center for Health Statistics from death certificate data, was used to categorize subjects into three decedent groups: dementia (n=88,523, 5.1%), cancer (n=389,754, 22.4%), and all other conditions (n=1,256,873, 72.5%). Site of death was identified as the hospital, home, nursing home, or another location as recorded on the death certificate. In each state, the proportion of hospital deaths in the three decedent groups was categorized as high, medium, and low based on terciles of the national distribution. Using multivariate analyses, associations between state-level variables and the proportion of deaths occurring in the hospital in each state were examined. The majority of dementia-related deaths in the United States occurred in nursing homes (66.9%). In contrast, most older persons with cancer died at home (37.8%) or in the hospital (35.4%). The hospital was the most common site of death for all other conditions (52.2%). The state-specific proportion of dementia-related deaths occurring in hospitals varied from 5.0% to 37.0% across the nation and was in the highest tercile in 18 states. Hospital death rates related to cancer and all other conditions were in the highest tercile in 14 of these 18 states. After multivariate adjustment, states with a greater number of hospital beds per 1,000 persons and a lower percentage of decedents aged 85 and older were more likely to have a higher proportion of hospital deaths in all three decedent groups. Additionally, in the dementia cohort, states with fewer nursing home beds had a greater proportion of hospital deaths. The majority of older Americans whose underlying cause of death is attributable to dementia on their death certificate die in nursing homes. State-level factors, including the availability of hospital and nursing home beds and the age of decedents in the population, explain, in part, the wide state-to-state variability in the proportion of dementia-related deaths occurring in the hospital.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                PLoS
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                June 2014
                3 June 2014
                : 11
                : 6
                : e1001653
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Sussex Community NHS Trust, Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
                Weill Cornell Medical College, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CJE WG IJH YH BAD SH. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: CJE. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: WG BAD YH IJH SH. ICMJE criteria for authorship read and met: CJE YH BAD SH IJH GW. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: CJE WG IJH BAD SH YH. Data checking, recoding, and linking of datasets: WG YH. Data analysis: WG YH. Critical review: CJE WG IJH BAD SH YH. Obtained research funding: IJH WG.

                Membership of the GUIDE_Care project is provided in the Acknowledgments.

                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-14-00803
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1001653
                4043499
                24892645
                007e7ba6-ec1c-4ae9-b18f-34078fa385c6
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 March 2014
                : 17 April 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                The GUIDE_Care project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research(NIHR HS&DR) programme (Project number 09/2000/58). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Epidemiology of Aging
                Health Care
                Health Services Research
                Palliative Care
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The database is provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), UK to King's College London, and held at King's. However, access to the full data set is restricted to individuals holding Individual Approvals with the ONS. Individual access to the full database would require formal approval by the ONS.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article