+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Dipyridamole Test in Angina Pectoris: Diagnostic Value and Pathophysiological Implications

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The value of the dipyridamole test (0.75 mg/kg i.v.) in the diagnosis of angina pectoris was studied in 54 patients with angina pectoris (35 with angina on effort associated or not associated with rest angina and 19 with angina only at rest) and in 12 control subjects. The test induced electrocardiographic signs of ischemia (positive test) in 74% of patients with angina on effort, while it was negative in all cases with angina only at rest and in control subjects. All anginal patients with normal coronary arteries or with less than 50% stenosis had a negative test; a positive response was observed in 36, 79 and 60% of cases with one-, two- or three-vessel disease, respectively. Hemodynamic changes with a marked arteriolar vasodilatation were observed both in the negative and in the positive tests. In the positive tests no significant change of double product, blood pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure occurred before ischemia appeared. The results of the study show that dipyridamole as a diagnostic test in angina pectoris has a high specificity but a lower sensitivity than exercise test. The hemodynamic and eletrocardiographic findings in the positive tests suggest that dipyridamole-induced ischemia is due to a flow maldistribution with selective subendocardial ischemia secondary to the coronary arteriolar dilatation caused by the drug.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          07 November 2008
          : 69
          : 1
          : 34-41
          Divison of Cardiology, University Hospital, Pavia, Italy
          173480 Cardiology 1982;69:34–41
          © 1982 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article