4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 5 , 3 , 6 , 6 , 3 , 6 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 1 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 11 , 11 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 13 , 14 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 15 , 15 , 4 , 8 , 16 , 16 , 17 , 17 , 18 , 3 , 19 , 19 , 19 , 5 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 20 , 20 , 13 , 21 , 12 , 12 , 2 , 11 , 3 , 1
      International Journal of Stroke
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and hypothesis Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase remains standard care prior to thrombectomy for eligible patients within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset. However, alteplase only succeeds in reperfusing large vessel arterial occlusion prior to thrombectomy in a minority of patients. We hypothesized that tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase in achieving reperfusion at initial angiogram, when administered within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset, in patients planned to undergo endovascular therapy. Study design EXTEND-IA TNK is an investigator-initiated, phase II, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint non-inferiority study. Eligibility requires a diagnosis of ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of stroke onset, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale≤3 (no upper age limit), large vessel occlusion (internal carotid, basilar, or middle cerebral artery) on multimodal computed tomography and absence of contraindications to intravenous thrombolysis. Patients are randomized to either IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, max 90 mg) or tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, max 25 mg) prior to thrombectomy. Study outcomes The primary outcome measure is reperfusion on the initial catheter angiogram, assessed as modified treatment in cerebral infarction 2 b/3 or the absence of retrievable thrombus. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale at day 90 and favorable clinical response (reduction in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale by ≥8 points or reaching 0-1) at day 3. Safety outcomes are death and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02388061.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples.

          This paper discusses the benefits and limitations of adaptive sample size re-estimation for phase 3 confirmatory clinical trials. Comparisons are made with more traditional fixed sample and group sequential designs. It is seen that the real benefit of the adaptive approach arises through the ability to invest sample size resources into the trial in stages. The trial starts with a small up-front sample size commitment. Additional sample size resources are committed to the trial only if promising results are obtained at an interim analysis. This strategy is shown through examples of actual trials, one in neurology and one in cardiology, to be more advantageous than the fixed sample or group sequential approaches in certain settings. A major factor that has generated controversy and inhibited more widespread use of these methods has been their reliance on non-standard tests and p-values for preserving the type-1 error. If, however, the sample size is only increased when interim results are promising, one can dispense with these non-standard methods of inference. Therefore, in the spirit of making adaptive increases in trial size more widely appealing and readily implementable we here define those promising circumstances in which a conventional final inference can be performed while preserving the overall type-1 error. Methodological, regulatory and operational issues are examined. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Solitaire™ with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SWIFT PRIME) trial: protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing the Solitaire revascularization device with IV tPA with IV tPA alone in acute ischemic stroke

            Rationale Early reperfusion in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke is critical, especially for patients with large vessel occlusion who have poor prognosis without revascularization. Solitaire™ stent retriever devices have been shown to immediately restore vascular perfusion safely, rapidly, and effectively in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions. Aim The aim of the study was to demonstrate that, among patients with large vessel, anterior circulation occlusion who have received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, treatment with Solitaire revascularization devices reduces degree of disability 3 months post stroke. Design The study is a global multicenter, two-arm, prospective, randomized, open, blinded end-point trial comparing functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients who are treated with either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone or intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in combination with the Solitaire device. Up to 833 patients will be enrolled. Procedures Patients who have received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator are randomized to either continue with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone or additionally proceed to neurothrombectomy using the Solitaire device within six-hours of symptom onset. Study Outcomes The primary end-point is 90-day global disability, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes include mortality at 90 days, functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) at 90 days, change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 27 h, reperfusion at 27 h, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b/3 flow at the end of the procedure. Analysis Statistical analysis will be conducted using simultaneous success criteria on the overall distribution of modified Rankin Scale (Rankin shift) and proportions of subjects achieving functional independence (mRS 0–2).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute stroke imaging research roadmap.

              The recent "Advanced Neuroimaging for Acute Stroke Treatment" meeting on September 7 and 8, 2007 in Washington DC, brought together stroke neurologists, neuroradiologists, emergency physicians, neuroimaging research scientists, members of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), industry representatives, and members of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the role of advanced neuroimaging in acute stroke treatment. The goals of the meeting were to assess state-of-the-art practice in terms of acute stroke imaging research and to propose specific recommendations regarding: (1) the standardization of perfusion and penumbral imaging techniques, (2) the validation of the accuracy and clinical utility of imaging markers of the ischemic penumbra, (3) the validation of imaging biomarkers relevant to clinical outcomes, and (4) the creation of a central repository to achieve these goals. The present article summarizes these recommendations and examines practical steps to achieve them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Stroke
                International Journal of Stroke
                SAGE Publications
                1747-4930
                1747-4949
                September 20 2017
                September 27 2017
                April 2018
                : 13
                : 3
                : 328-334
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
                [4 ]Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [5 ]Department of Neurosciences, Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [6 ]Austin Hospital, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
                [7 ]School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
                [8 ]Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [9 ]Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [10 ]Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne and Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans Victoria, Australia
                [11 ]Department of Neurology, Priority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
                [12 ]Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
                [13 ]Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
                [14 ]Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [15 ]Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
                [16 ]Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [17 ]Auckland Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
                [18 ]Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [19 ]Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [20 ]Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Prahran Victoria, Australia
                [21 ]Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
                Article
                10.1177/1747493017733935
                28952914
                00c52d30-1b95-4965-bf76-15926bf63e86
                © 2018

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article