4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.

      Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
      Clinical Trials as Topic, Electric Stimulation Therapy, methods, Equipment and Supplies, Health Behavior, Humans, Laser Therapy, Paralysis, complications, Patient Education as Topic, organization & administration, Pressure Ulcer, etiology, prevention & control, therapy, Radiation, Spinal Cord Injuries, Telemedicine, Wound Healing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To systematically review evidence on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers in those with a spinal cord injury (SCI). For this evidence-based review, the following data sources were used: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. To be selected for inclusion in the current review, there had to have been an intervention, studies had to have 3 or more subjects, and 50% or more of the participating group had to have an SCI. Data extracted included study design, subject demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study type, sample size, outcome measures used, and study results. Articles selected for this review were organized into 1 of 2 categories: prevention or treatment. Within each broad category, several smaller ones were created, and articles were grouped according to the prevention (direct or indirect) or treatment intervention discussed. Of the 26 articles selected for inclusion in the systematic review, 7 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that dealt with treatment for pressure ulcers, and there was 1 RCT on prevention. Despite the cost-effectiveness of prevention, little research exists on preventative interventions, and what does exist is mostly level 4 evidence. More research is needed for both prevention and treatment, but especially the former.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article