5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Criterios para evaluar el proceso de supervisión en terapia psicoanalítica: aportes del Diagnóstico Psicodinámico Operacionalizado 2 (OPD-2) Translated title: Criteria to assess the psychoanalytical therapy supervision process: contributions of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostic (OPD-2)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introducción: la terapia psicoanalítica contemporánea suscribe una planificación y evaluación del proceso que combine juicio clínico con evidencias empíricas (Barber y Sharpless, 2015; Juan y Pozzi, 2016). Objetivos y estructura: este artículo presenta una organización de criterios para evaluar el proceso de supervisión en terapia psicoanalítica. Se combinan aspectos clásicos con aportes del Diagnóstico Psicodinámico Operacionalizado 2 (OPD-2) (Grupo de Trabajo OPD, 2006/2008). Se ofrecen guías para sistematizar la descripción del caso, su evolución, y los motivos y expectativas del terapeuta para supervisar. El OPD-2 es utilizado para operacionalizar el diagnóstico del paciente supervisado y evaluar el progreso durante el tratamiento. Los parámetros ofrecidos se ejemplifican mediante un material clínico. Discusión: se analiza la utilidad de los criterios presentados como recurso para la actividad de supervisión y la práctica clínica. También se discuten sus implicancias para la investigación empírica que evalúe mecanismos de cambio en terapia psicoanalítica.

          Translated abstract

          Introduction: contemporary psychoanalytic therapy goes through a planning and evaluation process that combines clinical judgment and empirical evidence (Barber and Sharpless, 2015; John and Pozzi, 2016). Objectives and structure: this article presents a body of criteria applied to assess the supervision process in psychoanalytic therapy. Classical aspects are combined to contributions from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostic 2 (OPD-2) (OPD Work Group, 2006 / 2008). Guidelines are offered to systematize the description of the case, its evolution, as well as the motives and expectations of the therapist regarding supervision The OPD-2 is applied to operationalize the diagnosis of the supervised patient and assess progress during treatment. The parameters offered are exemplified by means of clinical material. Discussion: the contributions of the criteria presented as a resource for the supervising activity and clinical practice are discussed. Their implication for empirical research assessing change mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy are also discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structural change as a predictor of long-term follow-up outcome.

          Based on data from psychoanalytic long-term psychotherapies, the predictive value of three measures of pre-post change for retrospective patient assessments of outcome at 1-year and 3-year follow-up was investigated. Pre-post changes were measured using the Global Severity Index (GSI), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) total score, and the Heidelberg Structural Change Scale (HSCS). In line with psychoanalytic theory, it was assumed that structural changes cause especially persistent changes and would, therefore, be most suitable to predict the follow-up criterion. This expectation was confirmed: Pre-post changes in GSI and IIP were only weakly associated with assessments at 1-year follow-up and not at all with assessments at 3-year follow-up. In contrast, correlations between changes in HSCS and outcome assessments were highly significant at both occasions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            DSM-5, OPD-2 y PDM: Convergencias y divergencias entre los nuevos sistemas diagnósticos psiquiátrico y psicoanalítico

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              La evaluación de primeras entrevistas psicoterapéuticas mediante el sistema Diagnóstico Psicodinámico Operacionalizado (OPD-2)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Journal
                spc
                Subjetividad y procesos cognitivos
                Subj. procesos cogn.
                Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, , Argentina )
                1852-7310
                December 2017
                : 21
                : 2
                : 59-81
                Affiliations
                [02] orgnameAsociación Psicoanalítica de Buenos Aires orgdiv1Instituto Universitario de Salud Mental
                [01] orgnameUBA orgdiv1Facultad de Psicología
                Article
                S1852-73102017000200003
                00f82812-0118-46ff-b3ed-0a9c0899ac47

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 17 September 2017
                : 26 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 31, Pages: 23
                Product

                SciELO Argentina


                Psychoanalytic therapy,Supervision,Assessment,OPD-2,Change Mechanisms,Terapia psicoanalítica,Supervisión,Evaluación,Mecanismos de cambio

                Comments

                Comment on this article