20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pathological Importance of the Endothelin-1/ET B Receptor System on Vascular Diseases

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Activation of the endothelin (ET)-1/ET receptor system is involved in the development of vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis, vascular hypertrophy, and restenosis. Some issues still remain unresolved including whether ET receptor antagonists are expected to become the new therapeutic tools for the treatment of vascular diseases. One of the unresolved critical points is the functional role of ET receptor subtypes on each vascular disease, in particular the pathophysiological roles of the ET B receptor. We recently demonstrated that selective inhibition of the ET B receptor system showed harmful effects in the development of neointimal formation after vascular injury. However, there was no apparent difference in the therapeutic effects between a nonselective ET A/ET B receptor antagonist and selective ET A receptor antagonist. These findings indicate that antagonism of the ET A receptor system is essential for suppressing vascular remodeling, irrespective of the presence of ET B-receptor-mediated actions, although the selective ET B receptor antagonist worsens vascular remodeling. In addition, we found that ET receptor systems contribute to sex differences in the severity of vascular disease, thereby suggesting that the efficacy of ET receptor antagonists for vascular diseases may differ between sexes. In this paper, we outline the roles of the ET-1/ET B receptor system on vascular diseases and its sex differences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women.

          To critically review the risks and benefits of hormone therapy for asymptomatic postmenopausal women who are considering long-term hormone therapy to prevent disease or to prolong life. Review of the English-language literature since 1970 on the effect of estrogen therapy and estrogen plus progestin therapy on endometrial cancer, breast cancer, coronary heart disease, osteoporosis, and stroke. We used standard meta-analytic statistical methods to pool estimates from studies to determine summary relative risks for these diseases in hormone users and modified lifetable methods to estimate changes in lifetime probability and life expectancy due to use of hormone regimens. There is evidence that estrogen therapy decreases risk for coronary heart disease and for hip fracture, but long-term estrogen therapy increases risk for endometrial cancer and may be associated with a small increase in risk for breast cancer. The increase in endometrial cancer risk can probably be avoided by adding a progestin to the estrogen regimen for women who have a uterus, but the effects of combination hormones on risk for other diseases has not been adequately studied. We present estimates for changes in lifetime probabilities of disease and life expectancy due to hormone therapy in women who have had a hysterectomy; with coronary heart disease; and at increased risk for coronary heart disease, hip fracture, and breast cancer. Hormone therapy should probably be recommended for women who have had a hysterectomy and for those with coronary heart disease or at high risk for coronary heart disease. For other women, the best course of action is unclear.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins.

            Postmenopausal estrogen-replacement therapy may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, and this beneficial effect may be mediated in part by favorable changes in plasma lipid levels. However, the effects on plasma lipoprotein levels of postmenopausal estrogens in the low doses currently used have not been precisely quantified, and the mechanism of these effects is unknown. We conducted two randomized, double-blind crossover studies in healthy postmenopausal women who had normal lipid values at base line. In study 1, 31 women received placebo and conjugated estrogens at two doses (0.625 mg and 1.25 mg per day), each treatment for three months. In study 2, nine women received placebo, oral micronized estradiol (2 mg per day), and transdermal estradiol (0.1 mg twice a week), each treatment for six weeks. The metabolism of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was measured by endogenously labeling their protein component, apolipoprotein B. In study 1, the conjugated estrogens at doses of 0.625 mg per day and 1.25 mg per day decreased the mean LDL cholesterol level by 15 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 11 to 19 percent; P less than 0.0001) and 19 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 23 percent; P less than 0.0001), respectively; increased the HDL cholesterol level by 16 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 12 to 20 percent; P less than 0.0001) and 18 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 14 to 22 percent; P less than 0.0001), respectively; and increased VLDL triglyceride levels by 24 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 8 to 40 percent; P less than 0.003) and 42 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 26 to 58 percent; P less than 0.0001), respectively. In study 2, oral estradiol increased the mean concentration of large VLDL apolipoprotein B by 30 +/- 10 percent (P = 0.05) by increasing its production rate by 82 +/- 18 percent (P less than 0.01). Most of this additional large VLDL was cleared directly from the circulation and was not converted to small VLDL or LDL. Oral estradiol reduced LDL cholesterol concentrations by 14 +/- 3 percent (P less than 0.005), because LDL catabolism increased by 36 +/- 7 percent (P less than 0.005). The oral estradiol increased the HDL cholesterol level by 15 +/- 2 percent (P less than 0.0001). Transdermal estradiol had no effect. The postmenopausal use of oral estrogens in low doses favorably alters LDL and HDL levels that may protect women against atherosclerosis, while minimizing potentially adverse effects on triglyceride levels. The decrease in LDL levels results from accelerated LDL catabolism; the increase in triglyceride levels results from increased production of large, triglyceride-rich VLDL.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The vascular protective effects of estrogen.

              There is now strong epidemiological evidence that estrogen replacement therapy has a protective effect in postmenopausal women. The cardiovascular protective action of estrogen is reported to be mediated indirectly by an effect on lipoprotein metabolism and by a direct effect on the vessel wall itself. Estrogen is active both in vascular smooth muscle and endothelium. Functionally competent estrogen receptors have been identified in vascular smooth muscle cells, and specific binding sites have been demonstrated in endothelium. Estrogen administration promotes vasodilation both in human and experimental animals, in part by stimulating] prostacyclin and nitric oxide synthesis. Both the prostaglandin synthase and the constitutive nitric oxide synthase were recently reported to be induced by estrogen treatment. In vitro, estrogen exerts a direct inhibitory effect on the smooth muscle by inhibiting calcium influx. In addition, estrogen inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. In vivo, estradiol-17 beta prevents neointimal thickening after balloon injury and in rabbit cardiac transplant allografts. These data are consistent with in vitro studies wherein estrogen inhibits [3H]thymidine uptake by arterial segments from porcine coronary artery as well as proliferation of rabbit aortic vascular smooth muscle cells induced by hyperlipedemic serum. Recent studies have also reported an effect of estrogen on directed vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Furthermore, like other steroids, the effect of estrogen on the vessel wall has a rapid nongenomic component involving membrane phenomena, such as alteration of membrane ionic permeability and activation of membrane-bound enzymes, as well as the classical genomic effect involving estrogen receptor activation and gene expression. The nature of these estrogen response genes in the vessel wall and their relation to vasodilation and antiproliferation remain to be determined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cardiol Res Pract
                Cardiol Res Pract
                CRP
                Cardiology Research and Practice
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-8016
                2090-0597
                2012
                30 July 2012
                : 2012
                : 731970
                Affiliations
                1Laboratory of Pathological and Molecular Pharmacology, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1094, Japan
                2Department of Pharmacology, Kagawa University, Kita-gun, Kagawa 760-0016, Japan
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Theofilos M. Kolettis

                Article
                10.1155/2012/731970
                3413984
                22900227
                0125e3a2-577c-4a3f-afb0-c2451613bc65
                Copyright © 2012 Kento Kitada et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 May 2012
                : 27 June 2012
                Categories
                Review Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Cardiovascular Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article