28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Interfollicular Epidermis of Adult Mouse Tail Comprises Two Distinct Cell Lineages that Are Differentially Regulated by Wnt, Edaradd, and Lrig1

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current models of how mouse tail interfollicular epidermis (IFE) is maintained overlook the coexistence of two distinct terminal differentiation programs: parakeratotic (scale) and orthokeratotic (interscale). Lineage tracing and clonal analysis revealed that scale and interscale are maintained by unipotent cells in the underlying basal layer, with scale progenitors dividing more rapidly than interscale progenitors. Although scales are pigmented and precisely aligned with hair follicles, melanocytes and follicles were not necessary for scale differentiation. Epidermal Wnt signaling was required for scale enlargement during development and for postnatal maintenance of scale-interscale boundaries. Loss of Edaradd inhibited ventral scale formation, whereas loss of Lrig1 led to scale enlargement and fusion. In wild-type skin, Lrig1 was not expressed in IFE but was selectively upregulated in dermal fibroblasts underlying the interscale. We conclude that the different IFE differentiation compartments are maintained by distinct stem cell populations and are regulated by epidermal and dermal signals.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Tail interfollicular epidermis comprises two distinct differentiated lineages

          • The lineages are maintained by unipotent progenitors that differ in cell-cycle time

          • The lineages are independent of hair follicles and melanocytes

          • The lineages are regulated by Wnt, Edaradd, and Lrig1

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis.

          According to the current model of adult epidermal homeostasis, skin tissue is maintained by two discrete populations of progenitor cells: self-renewing stem cells; and their progeny, known as transit amplifying cells, which differentiate after several rounds of cell division. By making use of inducible genetic labelling, we have tracked the fate of a representative sample of progenitor cells in mouse tail epidermis at single-cell resolution in vivo at time intervals up to one year. Here we show that clone-size distributions are consistent with a new model of homeostasis involving only one type of progenitor cell. These cells are found to undergo both symmetric and asymmetric division at rates that ensure epidermal homeostasis. The results raise important questions about the potential role of stem cells on tissue maintenance in vivo.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Distinct contribution of stem and progenitor cells to epidermal maintenance.

            The skin interfollicular epidermis (IFE) is the first barrier against the external environment and its maintenance is critical for survival. Two seemingly opposite theories have been proposed to explain IFE homeostasis. One posits that IFE is maintained by long-lived slow-cycling stem cells that give rise to transit-amplifying cell progeny, whereas the other suggests that homeostasis is achieved by a single committed progenitor population that balances stochastic fate. Here we probe the cellular heterogeneity within the IFE using two different inducible Cre recombinase–oestrogen receptor constructs targeting IFE progenitors in mice. Quantitative analysis of clonal fate data and proliferation dynamics demonstrate the existence of two distinct proliferative cell compartments arranged in a hierarchy involving slow-cycling stem cells and committed progenitor cells. After wounding, only stem cells contribute substantially to the repair and long-term regeneration of the tissue, whereas committed progenitor cells make a limited contribution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lrig1 Expression Defines a Distinct Multipotent Stem Cell Population in Mammalian Epidermis

              Summary Lrig1 is a marker of human interfollicular epidermal stem cells and helps maintain stem cell quiescence. We show that, in mouse epidermis, Lrig1 defines the hair follicle junctional zone adjacent to the sebaceous glands and infundibulum. Lrig1 is a Myc target gene; loss of Lrig1 increases the proliferative capacity of stem cells in culture and results in epidermal hyperproliferation in vivo. Lrig1-expressing cells can give rise to all of the adult epidermal lineages in skin reconstitution assays. However, during homeostasis and on retinoic acid stimulation, they are bipotent, contributing to the sebaceous gland and interfollicular epidermis. β-catenin activation increases the size of the junctional zone compartment, and loss of Lrig1 causes a selective increase in β-catenin-induced ectopic hair follicle formation in the interfollicular epidermis. Our results suggest that Lrig1-positive cells constitute a previously unidentified reservoir of adult mouse interfollicular epidermal stem cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Stem Cell Reports
                Stem Cell Reports
                Stem Cell Reports
                Elsevier
                2213-6711
                4 June 2013
                4 June 2013
                04 June 2013
                : 1
                : 1
                : 19-27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King’s College London, 28th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
                [2 ]Norfolk and Waveney Cellular Pathology Network, The Cotman Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UB, UK
                [3 ]Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
                [4 ]The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author fiona.watt@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Article
                S2213-6711(13)00007-6
                10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.04.001
                3757744
                24052938
                0133e632-467a-4bea-9f4a-a068d01d90ad
                © 2013 The Authors

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 January 2013
                : 19 April 2013
                : 19 April 2013
                Categories
                Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article