29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A case of sudden painless loss of vision with partial spontaneous recovery

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Case Profile A 47-year-old female came with a history of loss of vision in the right eye since 4 days. It was sudden in onset and painless. She gave history of consulting an ophthalmologist within 12 h of visual loss and was treated with ocular massage and systemic acetazolamide. Within 24 h of initiation of treatment, the temporal half of vision was spontaneously restored partially. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable in both eyes. Visual acuity by Snellen's chart at presentation to us in right eye was 6/18, N10 and intraocular pressure by applanation tonometry was 12 mmHg. Right eye fundus picture is given below [Figures 1 and 2]. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula [Figure 3] and fundus fluorescein angiography was performed to confirm the diagnosis. Figure 1 Dilated fundus photograph of right eye Figure 2 Photo of optic disc of the right eye Figure 3 Optical coherence tomography of right eye Questions Describe the fundus picture in Figures 1 and 2. Describe OCT changes in [Figure 3] What is the most likely diagnosis? What is the most common causative factor leading to it? What could be the reason for the partial spontaneous recovery of the temporal field of vision? What systemic investigations would you like to perform in such a case? For answers please see page 71.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Central retinal artery occlusion: visual outcome.

          To investigate systematically the natural history of visual outcome in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). Cohort study. At entry, 244 consecutive patients (260 eyes) with CRAO (seen consecutively from 1973 to 2000) had a detailed ocular and medical history and ocular evaluation. CRAO eyes were classified into four categories: non-arteritic (NA) CRAO (171 eyes), NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing (35), transient NA-CRAO (41), and arteritic CRAO (13). Within 7 days of onset of CRAO, initial visual acuity differed among the four CRAO types (P < .0001). In eyes with vision of counting fingers or worse, it improved in 82% of eyes with transient NA-CRAO, 67% of eyes with NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, and 22% of eyes with NA-CRAO. Visual acuity improved primarily within the first 7 days (P < .0001). In the central 30-degree visual field, central scotoma was most common. Central visual field improved in 39% with transient NA-CRAO, 25% with NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, and 21% with NA-CRAO. Peripheral visual field was normal in 62.9% of eyes with transient NA-CRAO and 22.1% in those with NA-CRAO. In 51.9% of eyes with NA-CRAO, the only remaining visual field was a peripheral island. Peripheral fields improved in NA-CRAO (39%) and in transient NA-CRAO (39%). Classification of CRAO is crucial for understanding differences in visual outcome. Marked improvement in visual acuity and visual field can occur without treatment and is determined by several factors. Visual field information is essential to evaluate visual disability in CRAO.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fundus changes in central retinal artery occlusion.

            To investigate systematically the ophthalmoscopic fundus findings associated with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). The study included 240 consecutive patients (248 eyes) with CRAO. The eyes underwent detailed fundus evaluation and stereoscopic color fundus photography at initial and follow-up visits. Patients without evidence of giant cell arteritis were advised to have carotid Doppler imaging and echocardiography to determine the source of emboli. CRAO was classified into 3 types: permanent CRAO (175 eyes), permanent CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing (35 eyes), and transient CRAO (38 eyes). In the three types of CRAO, acute-phase and late-phase changes in the retina, optic disk, and retinal vessels were evaluated. The main findings during the initial examination in our clinic for permanent CRAO were retinal opacity in the posterior pole (58%), cherry-red spot (90%), box-carring (19%), retinal arterial attenuation (32%), and optic disk edema (22%) and pallor (39%). The most frequent findings identified at the late stage, based on survivorship curves, were optic atrophy (91%), retinal arterial attenuation (58%), cilioretinal collaterals (18%), and macular retinal pigment epithelial changes (11%). Compared with permanent CRAO, permanent CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing was associated with a lower incidence of all macular and optic disk abnormalities. For transient CRAO, the incidence of initial findings varied greatly compared with the other types. Intraarterial emboli were observed in 20% of patients. Carotid Doppler evaluation identified carotid vascular plaques in 67% of patients tested and hemodynamically significant (>50%) obstruction in 32%. Four percent of CRAOs presented with simultaneous bilateral onset. The type and incidence of fundus findings at the initial visit and in the late phase of CRAO vary by its type. This study confirms that retinal opacity is predominantly evident in the posterior retina, that optic disk findings at presentation are common, that CRAO associated with normal-appearing retinal vessels and/or optic disk is not rare, and that observation of emboli is infrequent. Clinicians should be aware of the various presentation findings during the acute and late stages of CRAO and its various types. A complete picture of CRAO is provided by combined information of our clinical and experimental studies of CRAO.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Branch retinal artery occlusion: natural history of visual outcome.

              To investigate systematically the natural history of visual outcome in branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO). Cohort study. We included 199 consecutive untreated patients (212 eyes) with BRAO, first seen in our clinic from 1973 to 2000. At first visit, all patients had a detailed ophthalmic and medical history, and comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation. Visual evaluation was done by recording visual acuity, using the Snellen visual acuity chart, and visual fields with a Goldmann perimeter. The same ophthalmic evaluation was performed at each follow-up visit. Visual acuity and visual fields. We classified BRAO into permanent (133 eyes) and transient (18 eyes) and cilioretinal artery occlusion (CLRAO; 61 eyes). In eyes with permanent BRAO, of the 61 eyes seen within 7 days of onset, initial visual acuity was >or=20/40 in 74%, central scotoma in 20%, central inferior altitudinal defect in 13%, and inferior nasal and superior sector defects in 29% and 24%, respectively. Of those with follow-up, in the eyes with visual acuity or=20/40 and 1 (6%) or=20/40 in all during follow-up. In CLRAO on follow-up of 9 eyes, the central field improved in 4. When CLRAO was associated with retinal vein occlusion (38 eyes) or giant cell arteritis (12 eyes), visual findings were influenced by the associated diseases. These findings show that a visual acuity of >or=20/40 is seen initially in 74% of cases of permanent BRAO, 94% of transient BRAO, and 73% of nonarteritic CLRAO alone; and finally on follow-up, in 89%, 100%, and 100% of cases, respectively. The effectiveness of various treatment modalities for visual outcome has to be judged against this background. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Oman J Ophthalmol
                Oman J Ophthalmol
                OJO
                Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0974-620X
                0974-7842
                Jan-Apr 2016
                : 9
                : 1
                : 66
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Ophthalmology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr. Pradnya Jayant Kamat, 168, 8/2, Kamat Nursing Home, Upper Bazaar, Ponda, Goa - 403 401, India. E-mail: doc.pradnyakamat@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                OJO-9-66
                10.4103/0974-620X.176124
                4785714
                27013834
                0147d668-0ed7-47b9-b212-24d050bc624a
                Copyright: © Oman Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Clinical Quiz

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article