13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.

      European Heart Journal
      Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, therapy, Defibrillators, Implantable, Electric Countershock, adverse effects, methods, Electrocardiography, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices. Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 +/- 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402-392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517-496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4-11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article