9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early rearing history influences oxytocin receptor epigenetic regulation in rhesus macaques

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Epigenetically programmed stress adaptation may be a conduit for informing offspring of environmental challenge. We employed ChIP-sequencing to examine effects of early environment on epigenetic regulation using hippocampal samples from macaques exposed to disruption in maternal care. We found decreased H3K4me3 binding at genes critical to behavioral stress response, the most robust being the oxytocin receptor gene ( OXTR), for which we observed a corresponding decrease in RNA expression. Post hoc analysis showed that a gain-of-function OXTR SNP rescued behavioral differences in early stress-exposed subjects. Our data suggest that epigenetic down-modulation of OXTR in brain could contribute to behavioral differences observed in early stress-exposed subjects and that functional genetic variation plays a role. These could have translational implications for human psychiatric disease and personality disorders.

          Abstract

          Adaptations to stress can occur through epigenetic processes and may be a conduit for informing offspring of environmental challenge. We employed ChIP-sequencing for H3K4me3 to examine effects of early maternal deprivation (peer-rearing, PR) in archived rhesus macaque hippocampal samples (male, n = 13). Focusing on genes with roles in stress response and behavior, we assessed the effects of rearing on H3K4me3 binding by ANOVA. We found decreased H3K4me3 binding at genes critical to behavioral stress response, the most robust being the oxytocin receptor gene OXTR, for which we observed a corresponding decrease in RNA expression. Based on this finding, we performed behavioral analyses to determine whether a gain-of-function nonsynonymous OXTR SNP interacted with early stress to influence relevant behavioral stress reactivity phenotypes ( n = 194), revealing that this SNP partially rescued the PR phenotype. PR infants exhibited higher levels of separation anxiety and arousal in response to social separation, but infants carrying the alternative OXTR allele did not exhibit as great a separation response. These data indicate that the oxytocin system is involved in social-separation response and suggest that epigenetic down-modulation of OXTR could contribute to behavioral differences observed in PR animals. Epigenetic changes at OXTR may represent predictive adaptive responses that could impart readiness to respond to environmental challenge or maintain proximity to a caregiver but also contribute to behavioral pathology. Our data also demonstrate that OXTR polymorphism can permit animals to partially overcome the detrimental effects of early maternal deprivation, which could have translational implications for human psychiatric disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits.

          Evidence of marked variability in response among people exposed to the same environmental risk implies that individual differences in genetic susceptibility might be at work. The study of such Gene-by-Environment (GxE) interactions has gained momentum. In this article, the authors review research about one of the most extensive areas of inquiry: variation in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4; also known as 5-HTT) and its contribution to stress sensitivity. Research in this area has both advanced basic science and generated broader lessons for studying complex diseases and traits. The authors evaluate four lines of evidence about the 5-HTT stress-sensitivity hypothesis: 1) observational studies about the serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR), stress sensitivity, and depression in humans; 2) experimental neuroscience studies about the 5-HTTLPR and biological phenotypes relevant to the human stress response; 3) studies of 5-HTT variation and stress sensitivity in nonhuman primates; and 4) studies of stress sensitivity and genetically engineered 5-HTT mutations in rodents. The authors then dispel some misconceptions and offer recommendations for GxE research. The authors discuss how GxE interaction hypotheses can be tested with large and small samples, how GxE research can be carried out before as well as after replicated gene discovery, the uses of GxE research as a tool for gene discovery, the importance of construct validation in evaluating GxE research, and the contribution of GxE research to the public understanding of genetic science.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Darwinian concept of stress: benefits of allostasis and costs of allostatic load and the trade-offs in health and disease.

            Why do we get the stress-related diseases we do? Why do some people have flare ups of autoimmune disease, whereas others suffer from melancholic depression during a stressful period in their life? In the present review possible explanations will be given by using different levels of analysis. First, we explain in evolutionary terms why different organisms adopt different behavioral strategies to cope with stress. It has become clear that natural selection maintains a balance of different traits preserving genes for high aggression (Hawks) and low aggression (Doves) within a population. The existence of these personality types (Hawks-Doves) is widespread in the animal kingdom, not only between males and females but also within the same gender across species. Second, proximate (causal) explanations are given for the different stress responses and how they work. Hawks and Doves differ in underlying physiology and these differences are associated with their respective behavioral strategies; for example, bold Hawks preferentially adopt the fight-flight response when establishing a new territory or defending an existing territory, while cautious Doves show the freeze-hide response to adapt to threats in their environment. Thus, adaptive processes that actively maintain stability through change (allostasis) depend on the personality type and the associated stress responses. Third, we describe how the expression of the various stress responses can result in specific benefits to the organism. Fourth, we discuss how the benefits of allostasis and the costs of adaptation (allostatic load) lead to different trade-offs in health and disease, thereby reinforcing a Darwinian concept of stress. Collectively, this provides some explanation of why individuals may differ in their vulnerability to different stress-related diseases and how this relates to the range of personality types, especially aggressive Hawks and non-aggressive Doves in a population. A conceptual framework is presented showing that Hawks, due to inefficient management of mediators of allostasis, are more likely to be violent, to develop impulse control disorders, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, sudden death, atypical depression, chronic fatigue states and inflammation. In contrast, Doves, due to the greater release of mediators of allostasis (surplus), are more susceptible to anxiety disorders, metabolic syndromes, melancholic depression, psychotic states and infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome

              Early experience permanently alters behavior and physiology. These effects are, in part, mediated by sustained alterations in gene expression in selected brain regions. The critical question concerns the mechanism of these environmental “programming” effects. We examine this issue with an animal model that studies the consequences of variations in mother-infant interactions on the development of individual differences in behavioral and endocrine responses to stress in adulthood. Increased levels of pup licking/grooming by rat mothers in the first week of life alter DNA structure at a glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in the hippocampus of the offspring. Differences in the DNA methylation pattern between the offspring of high- and low-lickinglgrooming mothers emerge over the first week of life; they are reversed with cross-fostering; they persist into adulthood; and they are associated with altered histone acetylation and transcription factor (nerve growth factor-induced clone A [NGFIA]) binding to the glucocorticoid receptor promoter. DNA methylation alters glucocorticoid receptor expression through modifications of chromatin structure. Pharmacological reversal of the effects on chromatin structure completely eliminates the effects of maternal care on glucocorticoid receptor expression and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responses to stress, thus suggesting a causal relation between the maternally induced, epigenetic modification of the glucocorticoid receptor gene and the effects on stress responses in the offspring. These findings demonstrate that the structural modifications of the DNA can be established through environmental programming and that, in spite of the inherent stability of this epigenomic marker, it is dynamic and potentially reversible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                31 October 2017
                16 October 2017
                16 October 2017
                : 114
                : 44
                : 11769-11774
                Affiliations
                [1] aSection of Comparative Behavioral Genomics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH , Rockville, MD 20852;
                [2] bLaboratory of Clinical Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH , Bethesda, MD 20892;
                [3] cLaboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH , Bethesda, MD 20892;
                [4] dSection of Comparative Ethology, Eunice Shriver Kennedy National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH , Poolesville, MD 20837;
                [5] eInstitute des Sciences Cognitives Mar Jeannerod, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon , 69675 Bron Cedex, France;
                [6] fDepartment of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University , 68159 Mannheim, Germany;
                [7] gDepartment of Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University , 68159 Mannheim, Germany;
                [8] hDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
                [9] iCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University , S-58183 Linköping, Sweden;
                [10] jDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University , Provo, UT 84602
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: cbarr@ 123456mail.nih.gov .

                Edited by Bruce S. McEwen, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved September 15, 2017 (received for review April 27, 2017)

                Author contributions: P.F.F., D.G., J.D.H., S.J.S., and C.S.B. designed research; M.B., S.G.L., Z.Z., Q.Y., M.L.S., I.M.-C., E.S., A.P., P.F.F., R.K.S., M.R., W.H.S., J.F.L., R.C.T., M.H., and C.S.B. performed research; Z.Z., Q.Y., and M.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.B., S.G.L., M.L.S., E.S., A.P., R.K.S., W.H.S., and C.S.B. analyzed data; and C.A.D., I.M.-C., P.F.F., W.H.S., and C.S.B. wrote the paper.

                Article
                201706206
                10.1073/pnas.1706206114
                5676889
                29078292
                017f9daa-a487-4c75-90c9-316a7fbc531c
                Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This is an open access article distributed under the PNAS license.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 100000002
                Award ID: AA000311-02
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Neuroscience

                primate,epigenetic,stress,maternal care,oxytocin
                primate, epigenetic, stress, maternal care, oxytocin

                Comments

                Comment on this article