2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validación de Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) en español Translated title: Validation of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Spanish

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Objetivo: Validar Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) en español. Diseño: Estudio transversal, multicéntrico y de validación clinimétrica. Emplazamiento: Unidades de Atención Primaria. Participantes: En la fase de adaptación transcultural fueron 31 médicos de familia y en la de validación 219, todos activos en la práctica médica a nivel institucional y/o privado. Mediciones Principales: Adaptación transcultural (traducción directa, síntesis y conciliación de la versión por un comité de expertos, traducción inversa, conciliación de la traducción inversa con autores del cuestionario original, análisis de comprensión en una muestra de pacientes) y aspectos psicométricos (fiabilidad y validez). Resultados: Se realizó la adaptación transcultural, la pregunta guía 2 se homologó al SDM-Q-9. No se observaron valores negativos en la correlación de item corregido - con la correlación total; todos son mayores que 0,80. El Alfa de Cronbach fue de 0,963. El item 1 explicó una varianza del 77,2 %. La prueba de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) fue de 0,924 con una esfericidad de Barlett estadísticamente significativa. La matriz de correlación de Pearson demuestra una correlación positiva; en general la relación inter-item es mayor a 0,606. Conclusiones: Se ha validado un cuestionario útil, corto y accesible para aplicarse en Atención Primaria, para medir la toma de decisiones compartidas desde la perspectiva del médico.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Objective: To validate the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q- Doc) in Spanish. Design: Cross-sectional, multicenter, clinimetric validation study. Setting: Primary Care Units. Participants: In the cross-cultural adaptation phase there were 31 family doctors, and in the validation phase there were 219, all active medical professionals at the institutional and / or private level Main measures: Cross-cultural adaptation (direct translation, synthesis and reconciliation of the version by an expert committee, reverse translation, reconciliation of the reverse translation with authors of the original questionnaire, comprehension analysis in a sample of patients) and psychometric aspects (reliability and validity). Results: Cross-cultural adaptation was performed, guide question 2 was homologated to SDM-Q-9. No negative values were observed in the corrected item-total correlation- with the total correlation; all are higher than 0.80. Cronbach's Alpha was 0.963. Item 1 explained a variance of 77.2%. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was 0.924 with a statistically significant Barlett Sphericity. Pearson's correlation matrix shows a positive correlation; in general the inter-item relationship is greater than 0.606. Conclusions: A useful, short and accessible questionnaire to be applied in Primary Care has been validated to measure shared decision-making from the physician's perspective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Psychometric Theory.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Implementing shared decision making in the NHS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel.

              Use of research instruments standardised in English-speaking countries is commonplace in non-English speaking countries. This article describes technical, linguistic and conceptual issued raised in the translation and validation of an acceptable country-specific instrument. The Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale was validated for use in clinical supervision in Finland using quantitative and qualitative methods. The approach applied was triangulation. The focus of this paper, is to describe the item validation process of the scale using an expert panel (n=11) by means of the content validity index and panel interview. The process resulted in a country-specific 33-item instrument. The study indicated that content validity index and panel discussion are easy, but reliable ways of demonstrating the instrument's content validity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                albacete
                Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia
                Rev Clin Med Fam
                Sociedad Castellano-Manchega de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (Albacete, Castilla La Mancha, Spain )
                1699-695X
                2386-8201
                2020
                : 13
                : 3
                : 190-197
                Affiliations
                [3] orgnameHospital Universitario Dr. José E. González México
                [4] Monterrey orgnameUniversidad de Monterrey Mexico
                [1] orgnameRed Mexicana de Investigadores en Medicina Familiar A. C México
                [2] orgnameInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Mexico
                Article
                S1699-695X2020000300190 S1699-695X(20)01300300190
                018c4712-59c5-4233-901e-09a311e5d331

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 September 2020
                : 07 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 8
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                Toma de Decisión Conjunta,Decision Making. Shared,Family Practice,Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria,Surveys and Questionnaires,Encuestas y Cuestionarios

                Comments

                Comment on this article