There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
<div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S1">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d616868e173">Purpose:</h5>
<p id="P8">Clinically evaluate a modified surface Goldmann (GAT) tonometer prism for
IOP accuracy,
repeatability, and safety.
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S2">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d616868e178">Design:</h5>
<p id="P9">Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter reference
device reliability
and validity analysis
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S3">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d616868e183">Methods:</h5>
<p id="P10">A GAT and a modified surface GAT prism measured IOP on 173 unique eyes.
The study
design and analysis complied with FDA 510(k) and ANSIZ80.10–2014 guidelines. All eyes
were randomized to IOP measurement by one of 5 standard prisms or 5 modified prisms,
each from different manufacturing lot. Pressures were measured by 6-investigators,
2-times with each prism for a total of 1384 IOP measurements. Analysis included Bland-Altman
difference accuracy, intra-operator and inter-operator IOP measurement and manufactured
lot repeatability.
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S4">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d616868e188">Results:</h5>
<p id="P11">Bland-Altman indicated no IOP measurements pairs outside the +/−5mmHg
guidelines.
Operator and manufactured lot repeatability F-tests and one way ANOVAs indicated no
statistical difference between the standard and modified prisms (all p>0.10). The
difference in IOP measurements of the standard and modified prisms correlated well
to Dresdner CCT correction (p=0.01).
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S5">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d616868e193">Conclusion:</h5>
<p id="P12">A modified surface replacement prism is statistically equivalent to a
flat-surfaced
prism. The modified surface prism indicated statistically significant correction for
CCT requiring further testing outside the ANSI standard limits (0.500mm<CCT<0.600mm)
to examine its full potential.
</p>
</div>