20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-Compassion and Cultural Values: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Compassion Using a Multitrait-Multimethod (MTMM) Analytical Procedure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Self-compassion is natural, trainable and multi-faceted human capacity. To date there has been little research into the role of culture in influencing the conceptual structure of the underlying construct, the relative importance of different facets of self-compassion, nor its relationships to cultural values. This study employed a cross-cultural design, with 4,124 participants from 11 purposively sampled datasets drawn from different countries. We aimed to assess the relevance of positive and negative items when building the self-compassion construct, the convergence among the self-compassion components, and the possible influence of cultural values. Each dataset comprised undergraduate students who completed the “Self-Compassion Scale” (SCS). We used a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach to the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) model, separating the variability into self-compassion components (self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness), method (positive and negative valence), and error (uniqueness). The normative scores of the Values Survey Module (VSM) in each country, according to the cultural dimensions of individualism, masculinity, power distance, long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence, were considered. We used Spearman coefficients ( r s) to assess the degree of association between the cultural values and the variance coming from the positive and negative items to explain self-compassion traits, as well as the variance shared among the self-compassion traits, after removing the method effects produced by the item valence. The CFA applied to the MTMM model provided acceptable fit in all the samples. Positive items made a greater contribution to capturing the traits comprising self-compassion when the long-term orientation cultural value was higher ( r s = 0.62; p = 0.042). Negative items did not make significant contributions to building the construct when the individualism cultural value was higher, but moderate effects were found ( r s = 0.40; p = 0.228). The level of common variance among the self-compassion trait factors was inversely related to the indulgence cultural value ( r s = -0.65; p = 0.030). The extent to which the positive and negative items contribute to explain self-compassion, and that different self-compassion facets might be regarded as reflecting a broader construct, might differ across cultural backgrounds.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.

          Researchers from across the social sciences have found consistent deviations from the predictions of the canonical model of self-interest in hundreds of experiments from around the world. This research, however, cannot determine whether the uniformity results from universal patterns of human behavior or from the limited cultural variation available among the university students used in virtually all prior experimental work. To address this, we undertook a cross-cultural study of behavior in ultimatum, public goods, and dictator games in a range of small-scale societies exhibiting a wide variety of economic and cultural conditions. We found, first, that the canonical model - based on self-interest - fails in all of the societies studied. Second, our data reveal substantially more behavioral variability across social groups than has been found in previous research. Third, group-level differences in economic organization and the structure of social interactions explain a substantial portion of the behavioral variation across societies: the higher the degree of market integration and the higher the payoffs to cooperation in everyday life, the greater the level of prosociality expressed in experimental games. Fourth, the available individual-level economic and demographic variables do not consistently explain game behavior, either within or across groups. Fifth, in many cases experimental play appears to reflect the common interactional patterns of everyday life.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research.

              Fang Chen (2008)
              It is a common practice to export instruments developed in one culture to another. Little is known about the consequences of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Several studies were conducted to fill in this gap. Study 1 examined the impact of lacking factor loading invariance on regression slope comparisons. When factor loadings of a predictor are higher in the reference group (e.g., United States), for which the scale was developed, than in the focal group (e.g., China), into which the scale was imported, the predictive relationship (e.g., self-esteem predicting life satisfaction) is artificially stronger in the reference group but weaker in the focal group, creating a bogus interaction effect of predictor by group (e.g., self-esteem by culture); the opposite pattern is found when the reference group has higher loadings in an outcome variable. Studies 2 and 3 examined the impact of lacking loading and intercept (i.e., point of origin) invariance on factor means, respectively. When the reference group has higher loadings or intercepts, the mean is overestimated in that group but underestimated in the focal group, resulting in a pseudo group difference. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                21 December 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 2638
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network, RedIAPP , Zaragoza, Spain
                [2] 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3] 3School of Psychology, University of Sussex , Falmer, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky , Lexington, KY, United States
                [5] 5School of Physical Education, University of Jordan , Amman, Jordan
                [6] 6Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy, Hitotsubashi University Business School, Hitotsubashi University , Hitotsubashi, Japan
                [7] 7School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez , Santiago, Chile
                [8] 8Department of Psychology, University of Tehran , Tehran, Iran
                [9] 9Department of Psychology, Clemson University , Clemson, SC, United States
                [10] 10Department of Communicology, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa , Honolulu, HI, United States
                [11] 11Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University , Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [12] 12Laboratório de Ecologia Comportamental e Psicobiologia (DSE/CCEN), Universidade Federal da Paraiba , João Pessoa, Brazil
                [13] 13Special Education Department, Faculty of Education, King Khalid University , Asir, Saudi Arabia
                [14] 14Department of Psychology, The New Valley Faculty of Education, Assiut University , Assiut, Egypt
                [15] 15Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga , Chattanooga, TN, United States
                [16] 16College of Community and Human Services, Rikkyo University , Saitama, Japan
                [17] 17Department of Psychology, Korea University , Seoul, South Korea
                [18] 18Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet , Zaragoza, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Vivian Afi Abui Dzokoto, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

                Reviewed by: Yu Niiya, Hosei University, Japan; Katalin Dr. Papp, University of Debrecen, Hungary

                *Correspondence: Jesus Montero-Marin, jmonteromarin@ 123456hotmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02638
                6308155
                30622499
                01afca7c-f0bc-420b-984b-59f847f90c10
                Copyright © 2018 Montero-Marin, Kuyken, Crane, Gu, Baer, Al-Awamleh, Akutsu, Araya-Véliz, Ghorbani, Chen, Kim, Mantzios, Rolim dos Santos, Serramo López, Teleb, Watson, Yamaguchi, Yang and García-Campayo.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 September 2018
                : 07 December 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 84, Pages: 15, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III 10.13039/501100004587
                Funded by: European Regional Development Fund 10.13039/501100008530
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                self-compassion,scs,cross-cultural,multitrait-multimethod,mtmm,cfa
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                self-compassion, scs, cross-cultural, multitrait-multimethod, mtmm, cfa

                Comments

                Comment on this article