39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Body odour disgust sensitivity predicts authoritarian attitudes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Authoritarianism has resurfaced as a research topic in political psychology, as it appears relevant to explain current political trends. Authoritarian attitudes have been consistently linked to feelings of disgust, an emotion that is thought to have evolved to protect the organism from contamination. We hypothesized that body odour disgust sensitivity (BODS) might be associated with authoritarianism, as chemo-signalling is a primitive system for regulating interpersonal contact and disease avoidance, which are key features also in authoritarianism. We used well-validated scales for measuring BODS, authoritarianism and related constructs. Across two studies, we found that BODS is positively related to authoritarianism. In a third study, we showed a positive association between BODS scores and support for Donald Trump, who, at the time of data collection, was a presidential candidate with an agenda described as resonating with authoritarian attitudes. Authoritarianism fully explained the positive association between BODS and support for Donald Trump. Our findings highlight body odour disgust as a new and promising domain in political psychology research. Authoritarianism and BODS might be part of the same disease avoidance framework, and our results contribute to the growing evidence that contemporary social attitudes might be rooted in basic sensory functions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.

            What is the function of disgust? Whereas traditional models have suggested that disgust serves to protect the self or neutralize reminders of our animal nature, an evolutionary perspective suggests that disgust functions to solve 3 qualitatively different adaptive problems related to pathogen avoidance, mate choice, and social interaction. The authors investigated this 3-domain model of disgust across 4 studies and examined how sensitivity to these functional domains relates to individual differences in other psychological constructs. Consistent with their predictions, factor analyses demonstrated that disgust sensitivity partitions into domains related to pathogens, sexuality, and morality. Further, sensitivity to the 3 domains showed predictable differentiation based on sex, perceived vulnerability to disease, psychopathic tendencies, and Big 5 personality traits. In exploring these 3 domains of disgust, the authors introduce a new measure of disgust sensitivity. Appreciation of the functional heterogeneity of disgust has important implications for research on individual differences in disgust sensitivity, emotion, clinical impairments, and neuroscience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion.

              A reconceptualization of stigma is presented that changes the emphasis from the devaluation of an individual's identity to the process by which individuals who satisfy certain criteria come to be excluded from various kinds of social interactions. The authors propose that phenomena currently placed under the general rubric of stigma involve a set of distinct psychological systems designed by natural selection to solve specific problems associated with sociality. In particular, the authors suggest that human beings possess cognitive adaptations designed to cause them to avoid poor social exchange partners, join cooperative groups (for purposes of between-group competition and exploitation), and avoid contact with those who are differentially likely to carry communicable pathogens. The evolutionary view contributes to the current conceptualization of stigma by providing an account of the ultimate function of stigmatization and helping to explain its consensual nature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society Publishing
                2054-5703
                February 2018
                28 February 2018
                28 February 2018
                : 5
                : 2
                : 171091
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Stockholm University , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, ‘Magna Graecia’ University of Catanzaro , Catanzaro, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome , Rome, Italy
                [4 ]IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation , Rome, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [6 ]Swedish Collegium of Advanced Study , Uppsala, Sweden
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Jonas K. Olofsson e-mail: jonas.olofsson@ 123456psychology.su.se

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4001139.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-1253
                Article
                rsos171091
                10.1098/rsos.171091
                5830723
                29515834
                01d72a34-7e62-4fd3-9d23-c2c41fbbec2c
                © 2018 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 8 August 2017
                : 26 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359;
                Award ID: 2016-02018
                Award ID: 2016-02742
                Award ID: 421-2012-1125
                Award ID: 421-2012-806
                Funded by: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004472;
                Award ID: M14-0375:1
                Funded by: Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004722;
                Award ID: FO20160386
                Categories
                1001
                205
                Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                February, 2018

                olfaction,behavioural immune system,authoritarianism,body odours,social conservatism

                Comments

                Comment on this article