Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Improved Response Rates with Bortezomib in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Observational Study in Chinese Patients

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Bortezomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Efficacy and safety of bortezomib is well known; however, it was necessary to validate the data in patients with different ethnic backgrounds. The efficacy and safety of bortezomib was assessed in patients from China with relapsed/refractory MM in a real-world scenario.

      Methods

      This prospective, non-interventional, observational study enrolled both male and female Chinese patients, aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with relapsed or refractory MM. Administration of intravenous bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m 2 was recommended twice a week for 2 weeks (days 1, 4, 8 and 11), followed by a 10-day rest period (maximum of 8 cycles) and a follow-up every 12 weeks for 3 years. Efficacy assessments included best response, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.

      Results

      A total of 517 patients were enrolled with a median age of 58.7 years. Patients predominantly had immunoglobulin G type (46.2%) and stage III (47.8%) myeloma. Overall, 202 (42.3%) patients had partial response as best response, ORR was 88.9% and the proportion of patients exhibiting complete response was 24.7%. The median time to response observed was 27 (21–40) days. Median time to progression was 415 days and median overall survival was 475 days. Thrombocytopenia (14.4%) was the most common adverse event.

      Conclusion

      Bortezomib demonstrated clinical response in majority of patients and was well tolerated in this observational study in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

      Electronic supplementary material

      The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0159-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 28

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma.

      Bortezomib, a boronic acid dipeptide, is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has been shown in preclinical and phase 1 studies to have antimyeloma activity. In this multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 2 trial, we enrolled 202 patients with relapsed myeloma that was refractory to the therapy they had received most recently. Patients received 1.3 mg of bortezomib per square meter of body-surface area twice weekly for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week without treatment, for up to eight cycles (24 weeks). In patients with a suboptimal response, oral dexamethasone (20 mg daily, on the day of and the day after bortezomib administration) was added to the regimen. The response was evaluated according to the criteria of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and confirmed by an independent review committee. Of 193 patients who could be evaluated, 92 percent had been treated with three or more of the major classes of agents for myeloma, and in 91 percent, the myeloma was refractory to the therapy received most recently. The rate of response to bortezomib was 35 percent, and those with a response included 7 patients in whom myeloma protein became undetectable and 12 in whom myeloma protein was detectable only by immunofixation. The median overall survival was 16 months, with a median duration of response of 12 months. Grade 3 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (in 28 percent of patients), fatigue (in 12 percent), peripheral neuropathy (in 12 percent), and neutropenia (in 11 percent). Grade 4 events occurred in 14 percent of patients. Bortezomib, a member of a new class of anticancer drugs, is active in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma that is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: found
        • Article: not found

        Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma.

        The standard treatment for patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for high-dose therapy is melphalan and prednisone. This phase 3 study compared the use of melphalan and prednisone with or without bortezomib in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. We randomly assigned 682 patients to receive nine 6-week cycles of melphalan (at a dose of 9 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and prednisone (at a dose of 60 mg per square meter) on days 1 to 4, either alone or with bortezomib (at a dose of 1.3 mg per square meter) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 during cycles 1 to 4 and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 during cycles 5 to 9. The primary end point was the time to disease progression. The time to progression among patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone (bortezomib group) was 24.0 months, as compared with 16.6 months among those receiving melphalan-prednisone alone (control group) (hazard ratio for the bortezomib group, 0.48; P<0.001). The proportions of patients with a partial response or better were 71% in the bortezomib group and 35% in the control group; complete-response rates were 30% and 4%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of the response was 19.9 months in the bortezomib group and 13.1 months in the control group. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 for the bortezomib group (P=0.008). Adverse events were consistent with established profiles of toxic events associated with bortezomib and melphalan-prednisone. Grade 3 events occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the bortezomib group than in the control group (53% vs. 44%, P=0.02), but there were no significant differences in grade 4 events (28% and 27%, respectively) or treatment-related deaths (1% and 2%). Bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone was superior to melphalan-prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00111319.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial.

          Initial analysis of the Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) trial of relapsed multiple myeloma patients showed significantly longer time to progression, higher response rate, and improved survival with single-agent bortezomib versus high-dose dexamethasone. In this updated analysis (median follow-up: 22 months), survival was assessed in both arms, and efficacy updated for the bortezomib arm. Median survival was 29.8 months for bortezomib versus 23.7 months for dexamethasone, a 6-month benefit, despite substantial crossover from dexamethasone to bortezomib. Overall and complete response rates with bortezomib were 43% and 9%, respectively; among responding patients, 56% improved response with longer therapy beyond initial response, leading to continued improvement in overall quality of response. Higher response quality (100% M-protein reduction) was associated with longer response duration; response duration was not associated with time to response. These data confirm the activity of bortezomib and support extended treatment in relapsed multiple myeloma patients tolerating therapy.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            [ ]Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
            [ ]The Myeloma and Lymphoma Center, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
            [ ]Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
            [ ]Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
            [ ]Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning China
            [ ]Department of Hematology of Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning China
            [ ]The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning China
            [ ]Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Company, Beijing, China
            [ ]Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Rd, Luwan District, Shanghai, China
            Contributors
            drshenzx@126.com
            Journal
            Adv Ther
            Adv Ther
            Advances in Therapy
            Springer Healthcare (Heidelberg )
            0741-238X
            1865-8652
            21 October 2014
            21 October 2014
            2014
            : 31
            : 10
            : 1082-1094
            25331616 4209095 159 10.1007/s12325-014-0159-z
            © The Author(s) 2014
            Categories
            Original Research
            Custom metadata
            © Springer Healthcare 2014

            Comments

            Comment on this article