17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advances in the diagnosis and classification of gastric and intestinal motility disorders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Disturbances of gastric, intestinal and colonic motor and sensory functions affect a large proportion of the population worldwide, impair quality of life and cause considerable health-care costs. Assessment of gastrointestinal motility in these patients can serve to establish diagnosis and to guide therapy. Major advances in diagnostic techniques during the past 5–10 years have led to this update about indications for and selection and performance of currently available tests. As symptoms have poor concordance with gastrointestinal motor dysfunction, clinical motility testing is indicated in patients in whom there is no evidence of causative mucosal or structural diseases such as inflammatory or malignant disease. Transit tests using radiopaque markers, scintigraphy, breath tests and wireless motility capsules are noninvasive. Other tests of gastrointestinal contractility or sensation usually require intubation, typically represent second-line investigations limited to patients with severe symptoms and are performed at only specialized centres. This Consensus Statement details recommended tests as well as useful clinical alternatives for investigation of gastric, small bowel and colonic motility. The article provides recommendations on how to classify gastrointestinal motor disorders on the basis of test results and describes how test results guide treatment decisions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of patients with gastroparesis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1996 to 2006.

          The epidemiology of gastroparesis is unknown. We aimed to determine the incidence, prevalence, and outcome of gastroparesis in the community. Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a medical records linkage system in Olmsted County, Minnesota, we identified county residents with potential gastroparesis. The complete medical records were reviewed by a gastroenterologist. Three diagnostic definitions were used: (1) definite gastroparesis, delayed gastric emptying by standard scintigraphy and typical symptoms for more than 3 months; (2) probable gastroparesis, typical symptoms and food retention on endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal study; (3) possible gastroparesis, typical symptoms alone or delayed gastric emptying by scintigraphy without gastrointestinal symptoms. Poisson regression was used to assess the association of incidence rates with age, sex, and calendar period. Among 3604 potential cases of gastroparesis, 83 met diagnostic criteria for definite gastroparesis, 127 definite plus probable gastroparesis, and 222 any of the 3 definitions of gastroparesis. The age-adjusted (to the 2000 US white population) incidence per 100,000 person-years of definite gastroparesis for the years 1996-2006 was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.8) for men and 9.8 (95% CI, 7.5-12.1) for women. The age-adjusted prevalence of definite gastroparesis per 100,000 persons on January 1, 2007, was 9.6 (95% CI, 1.8-17.4) for men and 37.8 (95% CI, 23.3-52.4) for women. Overall survival was significantly lower than the age- and sex-specific expected survival computed from the Minnesota white population (P<.05). Gastroparesis is an uncommon condition in the community but is associated with a poor outcome.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test.

            The aim of the present study was to develop a breath test for measuring gastric emptying rate of solids that would induce less radiation exposure than radioscintigraphy and would be applicable to field testing. A test meal was used in which [14C]-octanoic acid was mixed with egg yolk and prepared as a scrambled egg. The test meal was labeled with a second marker, 99mTc-albumin colloid, and simultaneous radioscintigraphic and breath test measurements were performed in 36 subjects, 16 normal controls, and 20 patients with dyspeptic symptoms. Mathematical analysis of the excretion rate of labeled CO2 resulted in the definition of three parameters, i.e., gastric emptying coefficient, gastric half-emptying time, and lag phase. There was an excellent correlation between the gastric emptying coefficient and the scintigraphic half-emptying time (r = -0.88); between the half-emptying time determined by the breath test and the scintigraphic half-emptying time (r = 0.89); and between the lag phases determined by scintigraphy and those determined by breath test (r = 0.92). 14C can be replaced by 13C for labeling the octanoic acid used in the breath test. It is concluded that the octanoic acid breath test is a reliable noninvasive test to measure gastric emptying rate of solids.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

              This consensus statement from the members of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine recommends a standardized method for measuring gastric emptying (GE) by scintigraphy. A low-fat, egg-white meal with imaging at 0, 1, 2, and 4 h after meal ingestion, as described by a published multicenter protocol, provides standardized information about normal and delayed GE. Adoption of this standardized protocol will resolve the lack of uniformity of testing, add reliability and credibility to the results, and improve the clinical utility of the GE test.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101500079
                35771
                Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology
                1759-5045
                1759-5053
                19 July 2019
                06 April 2018
                May 2018
                23 July 2019
                : 15
                : 5
                : 291-308
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Israelitic Hospital, Academic Hospital University of Hamburg, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany.
                [2 ]University of Perugia, Piazza dell’Università, 1, 06121 Perugia, Italy.
                [3 ]Stanford University, 900 Blake Wilbur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
                [4 ]Flinders Medical Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
                [5 ]University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland, and St. Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
                [6 ]Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
                [7 ]Uppsala University Hospital, Building 40, SE‑75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
                [8 ]Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
                [9 ]University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 119–129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
                [10 ]Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
                [11 ]Queen Mary University of London, The Wingate Institute, 26 Ashfield Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AJ, UK.
                [12 ]University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
                [13 ]Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                All authors made substantial contributions to discussion of content and reviewed or edited the manuscript before submission. J.K. and M.C. wrote the article, and J.K. researched data for the article.

                Article
                NIHMS967615
                10.1038/nrgastro.2018.7
                6646879
                29622808
                01fcfd76-9580-4b69-90b2-8bda6de0158a

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article