14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure‐specific postoperative pain management recommendations

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , , the PROSPECT Working Group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association
      Anaesthesia
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      analgesia, caesarean section, caesarean delivery, pain

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Caesarean section is associated with moderate‐to‐severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction as well as breastfeeding success and mother‐child bonding. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after elective caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia. A systematic review utilising procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language between 1 May 2014 and 22 October 2020 evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating pain management for emergency or unplanned operative deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia were excluded. A total of 145 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients undergoing elective caesarean section performed under neuraxial anaesthesia, recommendations include intrathecal morphine 50–100 µg or diamorphine 300 µg administered pre‐operatively; paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone administered after delivery. If intrathecal opioid was not administered, single‐injection local anaesthetic wound infiltration; continuous wound local anaesthetic infusion; and/or fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane or quadratus lumborum blocks are recommended. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs with opioids used for rescue. The surgical technique should include a Joel‐Cohen incision; non‐closure of the peritoneum; and abdominal binders. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation could be used as analgesic adjunct. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations. Some interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence. Of note, these recommendations may not be applicable to unplanned deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references170

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.

          Effective postoperative analgesia after caesarean section is important because it enables early ambulation and facilitates breast-feeding. Several case reports have shown that local anaesthetic injection around the quadratus lumborum muscle is effective in providing pain relief after various abdominal operations and in patients with chronic pain. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is performed in close proximity to the surface and uses a fascial compartment path to extend the distribution of local anaesthesia into the posterior abdominal wall and paravertebral space. This central effect can be of vital importance when managing the visceral pain after caesarean section.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

            Effective postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery enhances early recovery, ambulation, and breastfeeding. In a previous study, we established the effectiveness of the quadratus lumborum block in providing pain relief after cesarean delivery compared with patient-controlled analgesia (morphine). In the current study, we hypothesized that this method would be equal to or better than the transversus abdominis plane block with regard to pain relief and its duration of action after cesarean delivery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Intra‐operative analgesia with remifentanil vs. dexmedetomidine: a systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Consultant/PhD Student
                Role: Professor
                Role: Professor
                Role: Professor and Chairmarc.vandevelde@uzleuven.be , @MarcVandeVelde6
                Journal
                Anaesthesia
                Anaesthesia
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044
                ANAE
                Anaesthesia
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0003-2409
                1365-2044
                28 December 2020
                May 2021
                : 76
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/anae.v76.5 )
                : 665-680
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Anesthesiology GZA Sint‐Augustinus Hospital Antwerp Belgium
                [ 2 ] Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KULeuven and UZLeuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 3 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Anesthesiology Orebro University Orebro Sweden
                [ 5 ] Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KULeuven and UZLeuven Leuven Belgium
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: M. Van de Velde

                Email: marc.vandevelde@ 123456uzleuven.be

                [*]

                Members of the PROSPECT Working Group, see Appendix  1.

                Article
                ANAE15339
                10.1111/anae.15339
                8048441
                33370462
                02312688-076e-436a-a7e8-d6a854e8ebcc
                © 2020 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 05 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 16, Words: 11957
                Funding
                Funded by: Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association (OAA)
                Funded by: European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA)
                Funded by: Pfizer Inc
                Funded by: Grunenthal
                Categories
                Guidelines
                Guidelines
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2021

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                analgesia,caesarean section,caesarean delivery,pain
                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                analgesia, caesarean section, caesarean delivery, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article