93
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e507">Question</h5> <p id="d663078e509">What are the associations between noninvasive oxygenation strategies and outcomes among adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e512">Findings</h5> <p id="d663078e514">In this systematic review and network meta-analysis that included 25 studies and 3804 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, compared with standard oxygen therapy there was a statistically significant lower risk of death with helmet noninvasive ventilation (risk ratio, 0.40) and face mask noninvasive ventilation (risk ratio, 0.83). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e517">Meaning</h5> <p id="d663078e519">Noninvasive oxygenation strategies compared with standard oxygen therapy were significantly associated with lower risk of death. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e523">Importance</h5> <p id="d663078e525">Treatment with noninvasive oxygenation strategies such as noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen may be more effective than standard oxygen therapy alone in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e528">Objective</h5> <p id="d663078e530">To compare the association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with mortality and endotracheal intubation in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e533">Data Sources</h5> <p id="d663078e535">The following bibliographic databases were searched from inception until April 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, and LILACS. No limits were applied to language, publication year, sex, or race. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e538">Study Selection</h5> <p id="d663078e540">Randomized clinical trials enrolling adult participants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure comparing high-flow nasal oxygen, face mask noninvasive ventilation, helmet noninvasive ventilation, or standard oxygen therapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e543">Data Extraction and Synthesis</h5> <p id="d663078e545">Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses using a bayesian framework to derive risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences along with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were conducted. GRADE methodology was used to rate the certainty in findings. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e548">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d663078e550">The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 90 days. A secondary outcome was endotracheal intubation up to 30 days. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e553">Results</h5> <p id="d663078e555">Twenty-five randomized clinical trials (3804 participants) were included. Compared with standard oxygen, treatment with helmet noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.40 [95% CrI, 0.24-0.63]; absolute risk difference, −0.19 [95% CrI, −0.37 to −0.09]; low certainty) and face mask noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.68-0.99]; absolute risk difference, −0.06 [95% CrI, −0.15 to −0.01]; moderate certainty) were associated with a lower risk of mortality (21 studies [3370 patients]). Helmet noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.26 [95% CrI, 0.14-0.46]; absolute risk difference, −0.32 [95% CrI, −0.60 to −0.16]; low certainty), face mask noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.62-0.90]; absolute risk difference, −0.12 [95% CrI, −0.25 to −0.05]; moderate certainty) and high-flow nasal oxygen (RR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.55-0.99]; absolute risk difference, −0.11 [95% CrI, −0.27 to −0.01]; moderate certainty) were associated with lower risk of endotracheal intubation (25 studies [3804 patients]). The risk of bias due to lack of blinding for intubation was deemed high. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi200062-11"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="title" id="d663078e558">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d663078e560">In this network meta-analysis of trials of adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with noninvasive oxygenation strategies compared with standard oxygen therapy was associated with lower risk of death. Further research is needed to better understand the relative benefits of each strategy. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d663078e563">This network meta-analysis of randomized trials estimates association of use of noninvasive ventilation (high-flow nasal oxygen; face mask or helmet noninvasive ventilation) vs standard oxygen therapy with mortality and endotracheal intubation among adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis

          Network meta‐analysis enables the simultaneous synthesis of a network of clinical trials comparing any number of treatments. Potential inconsistencies between estimates of relative treatment effects are an important concern, and several methods to detect inconsistency have been proposed. This paper is concerned with the node‐splitting approach, which is particularly attractive because of its straightforward interpretation, contrasting estimates from both direct and indirect evidence. However, node‐splitting analyses are labour‐intensive because each comparison of interest requires a separate model. It would be advantageous if node‐splitting models could be estimated automatically for all comparisons of interest. We present an unambiguous decision rule to choose which comparisons to split, and prove that it selects only comparisons in potentially inconsistent loops in the network, and that all potentially inconsistent loops in the network are investigated. Moreover, the decision rule circumvents problems with the parameterisation of multi‐arm trials, ensuring that model generation is trivial in all cases. Thus, our methods eliminate most of the manual work involved in using the node‐splitting approach, enabling the analyst to focus on interpreting the results. © 2015 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

            Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with a face mask is relatively ineffective at preventing endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Delivery of NIV with a helmet may be a superior strategy for these patients.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

              Summary Non-invasive mechanical ventilation has been increasingly used to avoid or serve as an alternative to intubation. Compared with medical therapy, and in some instances with invasive mechanical ventilation, it improves survival and reduces complications in selected patients with acute respiratory failure. The main indications are exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, pulmonary infiltrates in immunocompromised patients, and weaning of previously intubated stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, this technique can be used in postoperative patients or those with neurological diseases, to palliate symptoms in terminally ill patients, or to help with bronchoscopy; however further studies are needed in these situations before it can be regarded as first-line treatment. Non-invasive ventilation implemented as an alternative to intubation should be provided in an intensive care or high-dependency unit. When used to prevent intubation in otherwise stable patients it can be safely administered in an adequately staffed and monitored ward.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                June 04 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]Sidney Liswood Health Science Library, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]Applied Health Research Center (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [10 ]Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2020.9524
                7273316
                32496521
                028e24ca-ba85-4dbc-9cbd-1e1a9929ebca
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log