6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Responses of urban crows to con- and hetero-specific alarm calls in predator and non-predator zoo enclosures

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

          M A Elgar (1989)
          One commonly cited benefit to animals that forage in groups is an increase in the probability of detecting a predator, and a decrease in the time spent in predator detection. A mathematical model (Pulliam 1973) predicts a negative relationship between group size and vigilance rates. Over fifty studies of birds and mammals report that the relationship at least partly explains why individuals forage in groups. This review evaluates the strength of these conclusions based on their evidence. Those variables that may confound the relationship between vigilance and group size are outlined, and their control is assessed for each study. The variables I consider to be important include the density and type of food; competition between individuals; the proximity to both a safe place and the observer; the presence of predators; the visibility within the habitat; the composition of the group; the ambient temperature and the time of day. Based on these assessments, most of the studies fail to adequately demonstrate an unambiguous relationship between vigilance behavior and group size. Nevertheless, many studies reveal interesting features of the relationship between vigilance and group size that should provide fruitful avenues for future research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Characteristics of Some Animal Calls

            P Marler (1955)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure.

              Acquiring information from the cues and signals of other species of the same trophic level is widespread among animals, and can help individuals exploit resources and avoid predators. But can such interspecific information transfer also influence the spatial structure of species within communities? Whereas some species use heterospecific information without changing their position, we review research that indicates that heterospecific information is a driving factor in the formation or maintenance of temporary or stable mixed-species groups. Heterospecific information can also influence the organization of such groups, including leadership. Further, animals sometimes select habitats using heterospecific information. We survey interspecific information transfer, and evaluate the morphological, ecological and behavioral factors that make some species information sources and others information seekers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animal Cognition
                Anim Cogn
                Springer Nature
                1435-9448
                1435-9456
                January 2017
                October 2016
                : 20
                : 1
                : 43-51
                Article
                10.1007/s10071-016-1047-5
                029f4b43-2808-4dba-89b6-7c1e31d4f2fd
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article