5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The posteromedial corner of the knee: an international expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 17 , 30 , 13 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 26 , 38
      Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg
      Posteromedial corner, Knee, Diagnosis, Treatment, Delphi, Medial collateral ligament

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To establish recommendations for diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of posteromedial corner (PMC) knee injuries using a modified Delphi technique.

          Methods

          A list of statements concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment and rehabilitation of PMC injuries was created by a working group of four individuals. Using a modified Delphi technique, a group of 35 surgeons with expertise in PMC injuries was surveyed, on three occasions, to establish consensus on the inclusion or exclusion of each statement. Experts were encouraged to propose further suggestions or modifications following each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. The final document included statements reaching consensus in round three.

          Results

          Thirty-five experts had a 100% response rate for all three rounds. A total of 53 items achieved over 75% consensus. The overall rate of consensus was 82.8%. Statements pertaining to PMC reconstruction and those regarding the treatment of combined cruciate and PMC injuries reached 100% consensus. Consensus was reached for 85.7% of the statements on anatomy of the PMC, 90% for those relating to diagnosis, 70% relating to classification, 64.3% relating to the treatment of isolated PMC injuries, and 83.3% relating to rehabilitation after PMC reconstruction.

          Conclusion

          A modified Delphi technique was applied to generate an expert consensus statement concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation practices for PMC injuries of the knee with high levels of expert agreement. Though the majority of statements pertaining to anatomy, diagnosis, and rehabilitation reached consensus, there remains inconsistency as to the optimal approach to treating isolated PMC injuries. Additionally, there is a need for improved PMC injury classification.

          Level of evidence

          Level V.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

          To investigate how consensus is operationalized in Delphi studies and to explore the role of consensus in determining the results of these studies. Systematic review of a random sample of 100 English language Delphi studies, from two large multidisciplinary databases [ISI Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL)], published between 2000 and 2009. About 98 of the Delphi studies purported to assess consensus, although a definition for consensus was only provided in 72 of the studies (64 a priori). The most common definition for consensus was percent agreement (25 studies), with 75% being the median threshold to define consensus. Although the authors concluded in 86 of the studies that consensus was achieved, consensus was only specified a priori (with a threshold value) in 42 of these studies. Achievement of consensus was related to the decision to stop the Delphi study in only 23 studies, with 70 studies terminating after a specified number of rounds. Although consensus generally is felt to be of primary importance to the Delphi process, definitions of consensus vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria for reporting of methods of Delphi studies are required. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A technique for the measurement of a hitudes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions.

              Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presently evolving rapidly. In order to monitor the developments in surgical methods and clinical outcome, a national clinical database for knee ligament reconstructions was established in 2005 in Denmark. This study presents the first data with 2 year follow-up from the Danish ACL registry. All orthopaedic departments performing ACL reconstructions in Denmark, including private clinics, report to the registry. The database includes both surgery- and patient-related data. The surgeon reports anamnestic, objective knee laxity and operative data including graft and implant choices. At 1 year control, complications, reoperations, and objective knee laxity are recorded. The patient registers the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner function score preoperatively and at 1, 5 and 10 years follow-up. During the first 30 months, 5,872 knee-ligament reconstructions were registered. A total of 4,972 were primary ACL reconstructions, 443 were ACL revisions and 457 multiligament reconstructions. A total of 85% of all knee ligament reconstruction were reported to the database. A total of 71% of primary ACL reconstruction used hamstring tendon grafts and 21% used patella tendon graft. Meniscus injuries were treated in 35% of all patients. A total of 17% had significant cartilage lesions. At 2 years follow-up 3% of primary reconstructions were revised. Follow-up KOOS demonstrated specific differences between primary ACL, revision ACL, and multiligament reconstructions. Sports/recreation score were 40, 32, 28 and quality of life score were 40, 32, 33 for the respective groups. This study presents the first follow-up data from a national ACL registry. These data will become new international reference materials for outcome measures before and after ACL surgery. The database will enable future monitoring of ACL reconstruction techniques and outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jachahla@msn.com
                Journal
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0942-2056
                1433-7347
                26 October 2020
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.240684.c, ISNI 0000 0001 0705 3621, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, ; 1611 W. Harrison Street Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.239915.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2285 8823, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Hospital for Special Surgery, ; New York, NY USA
                [3 ]Twin Cities Orthopaedics, Edison, MN USA
                [4 ]Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Clinic, London, ON Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.411249.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0514 7202, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, ; São Paulo, SP Brazil
                [6 ]GRID grid.7080.f, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de La Sta Creu I Sant Pau, , Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ]GRID grid.7080.f, ICATME-Hospital Universitari Dexeus, , Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [8 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Stockholm South Hospital, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [9 ]GRID grid.418080.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2177 7052, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, ; Le Chesnay, France
                [10 ]GRID grid.55325.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0389 8485, Oslo University Hospital, ; Oslo, Norway
                [11 ]Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain
                [12 ]GRID grid.459389.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0493 1099, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Chirurgisch Traumatologisches Zentrum, ; Hamburg, Germany
                [13 ]GRID grid.473796.8, Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, ; Sydney, Australia
                [14 ]GRID grid.412756.3, ISNI 0000 0000 8580 6601, University of Rome Foro Italico, ; Rome, Italy
                [15 ]GRID grid.412269.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0585 7044, Sports Traumatology Center, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, , Tartu University Hospital, ; Tartu, Estonia
                [16 ]GRID grid.412826.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0611 0905, University Hospital Motol, ; Prague, Czech Republic
                [17 ]GRID grid.150338.c, ISNI 0000 0001 0721 9812, University Hospital of Geneva, ; Geneva, Switzerland
                [18 ]Ars Ortopedica, Clinical Ars Medica, Gravesano, Switzerland
                [19 ]University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
                [20 ]Clinique du Sport de Bordeaux, Mérignac-Bordeaux, France
                [21 ]Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [22 ]GRID grid.487326.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0407 2423, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, ; Oslo, Norway
                [23 ]GRID grid.154185.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 597X, Aarhus University Hospital, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [24 ]Centro de Tratamiento de Enfermedades Articulares, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [25 ]Cape Town Sports & Orthopaedic Clinic, Cape Town, South Africa
                [26 ]International Knee and Joint Centre, Abu Dhabi, UAE
                [27 ]Hospital La Fraternidad Habana, Madrid, Spain
                [28 ]GRID grid.7080.f, Parc de Salut Mar, , UAB, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [29 ]Hospital Clinico Mutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile
                [30 ]GRID grid.410558.d, ISNI 0000 0001 0035 6670, University of Thessalia, ; Larissa, Greece
                [31 ]Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia
                [32 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, , Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [33 ]GRID grid.4514.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, Nanometer Structure Consortium, , Lund University, ; Lund, Sweden
                [34 ]Zentrum Für Spezielle Gelenkchirurgie, Berlin, Germany
                [35 ]GRID grid.271052.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0374 5913, Wakamatsu Hospital, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, ; Kitakyushu, Japan
                [36 ]GRID grid.13648.38, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 3484, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, ; Hamburg, Germany
                [37 ]Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
                [38 ]GRID grid.416201.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0417 1173, Avon Orthopaedic Centre, ; Bristol, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-1150
                Article
                6336
                10.1007/s00167-020-06336-3
                7586411
                33104867
                02b0647a-abfa-4624-9e8b-6659b3e7ad01
                © European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 26 August 2020
                : 13 October 2020
                Categories
                Knee

                Surgery
                posteromedial corner,knee,diagnosis,treatment,delphi,medial collateral ligament
                Surgery
                posteromedial corner, knee, diagnosis, treatment, delphi, medial collateral ligament

                Comments

                Comment on this article