9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      You May Be Eligible for APC-Free Open Access

      Thanks to Read-and-Publish agreements with selected institutions in UK, Germany and Switzerland, your Article Processing Charges (APCs) might already be covered. Check if your institution is included and publish Open Access at no cost to you. 
      Check Institutional Eligibility

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Faktorielle Struktur motorischer Kompetenzen bei Grundschulkindern der ersten Klasse : Ergebnisse der Movement ABC-2

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Das Wissen über die faktorielle Struktur motorischer Kompetenzen ist unter anderem für die Interventionsplanung relevant; bei distinkten Faktoren sind domänspezifische Ansätze sinnvoll. Die zugrundeliegende Struktur ist ferner für die Interpretation von Gesamt- und Subskalenwerten bedeutsam. Fragestellung: Untersucht wird, ob den Leistungen von Grundschulkindern in der motorischen Testbatterie Movement ABC-2 ( Petermann, 2015) die drei distinkten, interkorrelierten Faktoren Handgeschicklichkeit, Balance und Ballfertigkeiten zugrunde liegen. Methode: Die Daten von n = 123 7- bis 8-jährigen Erstklässlern wurden mittels konfirmatorischer Faktorenanalyse ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: Das Originalmodell mit elf Indikatoren stellte sich für die betrachtete Stichprobe als nicht adäquat heraus. Nach Ausschluss des Indikators Mattenhüpfen 2 – besseres Bein konnte eine gute globale Passung des getrimmten dreifaktoriellen Modells mit korrelierten Faktoren nachgewiesen werden. Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung: Eine Revision einzelner Items für diese Altersgruppe scheint sinnvoll. Die Schwierigkeit des Items Mattenhüpfen 2 könnte erhöht werden, und das Item Zweihändiges Fangen könnte leicht abgeändert werden, um präzises Fangen isoliert zu erfassen. Diese Maßnahmen könnten auch dazu beitragen, das gesamte Leistungsspektrum in dieser Altersgruppe besser zu erfassen.

          Factor Structure of Motor Competencies in First Graders: Results of the Movement ABC-2

          Abstract. Theoretical background: The development of motor skills during childhood is crucial to later health as well as to cognitive and socioemotional development. Especially at the beginning of schooling, motor competencies, such as fine motor skills, are important for academic success. Knowledge about the factor structure of motor competencies is essential, among other things, for the planning of prevention programs and/or interventions for children with motor-coordination impairments. When several distinct factors underly children′s motor competencies, domain-specific interventions are necessary to address specific impairments. Regarding diagnostic procedures, knowledge about the factor structure is crucial for interpreting total test scores and subscale scores. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children – Second Edition (Movement ABC-2; Petermann, 2015) is often used to assess motor competencies and to plan interventions. It consists of the three scales: Manual Dexterity, Ball skills, and Balance. Empirical studies often but not always confirm a latent construct structure with these three distinct factors, whereas some studies indicate more factors, a common g-factor, and/or single items not loading high on the corresponding latent factor. Objective: The present study examines the factor structure of the age band 2 (7;0 – 10;11 years) of the Movement ABC-2 Test Battery using confirmatory factor analysis on a sample of first graders. A three-factor structure without a g-factor is hypothesized. We explore whether the three distinct, interrelated factors Manual Dexterity, Ball Skills, and Balance underlie the motor competencies of 7- to 8-year-old children. Method: N = 123 first-grade children were tested using the items of the age band 2 of the Movement ABC-2. The tasks were administered by trained psychology graduates and undergraduates individually in a quiet room in the children’s school. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to test the hypothesized three-factor model. Results: The original model with 11 indicators for the three factors did not fit the data. When the item “Hopping on mats – better leg” was eliminated, the three-factorial model was fitted well. Discussion and conclusion: Single items of the age band 2 of the Movement ABC-2 should be revised. The difficulty of the item “Hopping on mats” should be increased to prevent ceiling effects in this age band. The item “Catching with two hands” should be modified to assess precise catching without throwing skills. These changes could help to assess the full range of motor competencies in this age group. Future studies should examine the factor structure with larger samples, different (but homogeneous) age groups, and with children with motor coordination impairments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits.

              The mastery of fundamental movement skills (FMS) has been purported as contributing to children's physical, cognitive and social development and is thought to provide the foundation for an active lifestyle. Commonly developed in childhood and subsequently refined into context- and sport-specific skills, they include locomotor (e.g. running and hopping), manipulative or object control (e.g. catching and throwing) and stability (e.g. balancing and twisting) skills. The rationale for promoting the development of FMS in childhood relies on the existence of evidence on the current or future benefits associated with the acquisition of FMS proficiency. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the relationship between FMS competency and potential health benefits in children and adolescents. Benefits were defined in terms of psychological, physiological and behavioural outcomes that can impact public health. A systematic search of six electronic databases (EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and SportDiscus®) was conducted on 22 June 2009. Included studies were cross-sectional, longitudinal or experimental studies involving healthy children or adolescents (aged 3-18 years) that quantitatively analysed the relationship between FMS competency and potential benefits. The search identified 21 articles examining the relationship between FMS competency and eight potential benefits (i.e. global self-concept, perceived physical competence, cardio-respiratory fitness [CRF], muscular fitness, weight status, flexibility, physical activity and reduced sedentary behaviour). We found strong evidence for a positive association between FMS competency and physical activity in children and adolescents. There was also a positive relationship between FMS competency and CRF and an inverse association between FMS competency and weight status. Due to an inadequate number of studies, the relationship between FMS competency and the remaining benefits was classified as uncertain. More longitudinal and intervention research examining the relationship between FMS competency and potential psychological, physiological and behavioural outcomes in children and adolescents is recommended.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                kie
                Kindheit und Entwicklung
                Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen
                0942-5403
                2190-6246
                July 2022
                : 31
                : 3 , Schwerpunkt: Entwicklungsstörungen in der Kindheit
                : 174-184
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Deutschland
                Author notes
                PD Dr. Eva Michel, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Röntenring 10, 97070 Würzburg, Deutschland, eva.michel@ 123456uni-wuerzburg.de
                Article
                kie_31_3_174
                10.1026/0942-5403/a000385
                02b7a636-18ca-4b5a-ab2c-7c3908a7914a
                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

                History
                Funding
                Förderung: Die Daten entstammen dem Projekt „MEX“, das durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) finanziert wurde (MI 1717/1 – 1). Open Access-Veröffentlichung ermöglicht durch die Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.
                Categories
                Freier Beitrag

                Psychology,Family & Child studies,Development studies,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                confirmatory factor analysis,Diagnostik motorischer Funktionen,factorial validity,Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2,diagnosis of motor functions,konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse,faktorielle Validität

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log