2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD ®) is an invasive treatment for colorectal lesions not resectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. This study presents the first Greek experience of the FTRD ® procedure, assessing the efficacy and safety of EFTR.

          Methods:

          We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients treated with the FTRD ® at 2 referral centers from October 2015 through December 2018. The indications included difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early adenocarcinomas and subepithelial tumors. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection.

          Results:

          Technical success and R0 resection were achieved in 82.3% procedures (14/17) and in 87.5% of those with difficult adenomas (8 patients). In the subgroup with carcinomas (n=3), the rate of technical success and R0 resection was 66.6%, while in the subgroup with subepithelial tumors (n=6) the rate was 83.3%. Technical success and R0 resection were significantly lower for lesions >20 mm vs. ≤20 mm (P=0.0429). In the 17 patients a total of 3 adverse events occurred (17.6%) and one of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of EFTR around the appendix.

          Conclusions:

          Our study showed favorable results concerning EFTR feasibility, efficacy and safety, especially for lesions ≤20 mm, non-lifting adenomas, and subepithelial tumors. Technical success, R0 resection, and adverse events rates were comparable with previously published data. Larger randomized studies are needed to better define the clinical benefit and long-term outcomes of EFTR in selected patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).

          Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer, although it is not widely used in the colorectum because of technical difficulty. To examine the current status of colorectal ESDs at specialized endoscopic treatment centers. Multicenter cohort study using a prospectively completed database at 10 specialized institutions. From June 1998 to February 2008, 1111 colorectal tumors in 1090 patients were treated by ESD. Tumor size, macroscopic type, histology, procedure time, en bloc and curative resection rates and complications. Included in the 1111 tumors were 356 tubular adenomas, 519 intramucosal cancers, 112 superficial submucosal (SM) cancers, 101 SM deep cancers, 18 carcinoid tumors, 1 mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and 4 serrated lesions. Macroscopic types included 956 laterally spreading tumors, 30 depressed, 62 protruded, 44 recurrent, and 19 SM tumors. The en bloc and curative resection rates were 88% and 89%, respectively. The mean procedure time ± standard deviation was 116 ± 88 minutes with a mean tumor size of 35 ± 18 mm. Perforations occurred in 54 cases (4.9%) with 4 cases of delayed perforation (0.4%) and 17 cases of postoperative bleeding (1.5%). Two immediate perforations with ineffective endoscopic clipping and 3 delayed perforations required emergency surgery. Tumor size of 50 mm or larger was an independent risk factor for complications, whereas a large number of ESDs performed at an institution decreased the risk of complications. No long-term outcome data. ESD performed by experienced endoscopists is an effective alternative treatment to surgery, providing high en bloc and curative resection rates for large superficial colorectal tumors. Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study.

            Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) is an alternative to surgery for treatment of advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia up to 120 mm in size, but has been criticised for its potentially high recurrence rates. We aimed to quantify recurrence at 4 months (early) and 16 months (late) following successful WF-EMR and identify its risk factors and clinical significance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications

              Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel treatment of colorectal lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the full-thickness resection device.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Gastroenterol
                Ann Gastroenterol
                Annals of Gastroenterology
                Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (Greece )
                1108-7471
                1792-7463
                Sep-Oct 2019
                10 June 2019
                : 32
                : 5
                : 482-488
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete (Magdalini Velegraki, Maria Fragaki, Afroditi Mpitouli, Ioannis Dimas, Evangelos Voudoukis, Gregorios A. Paspatis)
                [b ]Department of Gastroenterology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens (Artemis Trikola, Konstantinos Vasiliadis, Gerasimos Stefanidis)
                [c ]Department of Histopathology, Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete (Elpida Giannikaki)
                [d ]Department of Histopathology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens (Amalia Kapranou, Athanasios Kordelas), Greece
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Gregorios A. Paspatis, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleion General Hospital, Knossou Avenue, 71409 Heraklion, Greece, e-mail address: gpaspatis@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                AnnGastroenterol-32-482
                10.20524/aog.2019.0392
                6686092
                31474795
                031c0d7a-1d45-4baf-af15-ddb91cae34b3
                Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 February 2019
                : 22 May 2019
                Categories
                Original Article

                colorectal adenoma,colorectal adenocarcinoma,endoscopic full-thickness resection,full-thickness resection device

                Comments

                Comment on this article