Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring Framework for Economy‐wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Summary

      The concept of a circular economy (CE) is gaining increasing attention from policy makers, industry, and academia. There is a rapidly evolving debate on definitions, limitations, the contribution to a wider sustainability agenda, and a need for indicators to assess the effectiveness of circular economy measures at larger scales. Herein, we present a framework for a comprehensive and economy‐wide biophysical assessment of a CE, utilizing and systematically linking official statistics on resource extraction and use and waste flows in a mass‐balanced approach. This framework builds on the widely applied framework of economy‐wide material flow accounting and expands it by integrating waste flows, recycling, and downcycled materials. We propose a comprehensive set of indicators that measure the scale and circularity of total material and waste flows and their socioeconomic and ecological loop closing. We applied this framework in the context of monitoring efforts for a CE in the European Union (EU28) for the year 2014. We found that 7.4 gigatons (Gt) of materials were processed in the EU and only 0.71 Gt of them were secondary materials. The derived input socioeconomic cycling rate of materials was therefore 9.6%. Further, of the 4.8 Gt of interim output flows, 14.8% were recycled or downcycled. Based on these findings and our first efforts in assessing sensitivity of the framework, a number of improvements are deemed necessary: improved reporting of wastes, explicit modeling of societal in‐use stocks, introduction of criteria for ecological cycling, and disaggregated mass‐based indicators to evaluate environmental impacts of different materials and circularity initiatives.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 71

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.

      Increasing energy use, climate change, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuels make switching to low-carbon fuels a high priority. Biofuels are a potential low-carbon energy source, but whether biofuels offer carbon savings depends on how they are produced. Converting rainforests, peatlands, savannas, or grasslands to produce food crop-based biofuels in Brazil, Southeast Asia, and the United States creates a "biofuel carbon debt" by releasing 17 to 420 times more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions that these biofuels would provide by displacing fossil fuels. In contrast, biofuels made from waste biomass or from biomass grown on degraded and abandoned agricultural lands planted with perennials incur little or no carbon debt and can offer immediate and sustained GHG advantages.
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis

         Helmut Haberl (2014)
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The material footprint of nations.

          Metrics on resource productivity currently used by governments suggest that some developed countries have increased the use of natural resources at a slower rate than economic growth (relative decoupling) or have even managed to use fewer resources over time (absolute decoupling). Using the material footprint (MF), a consumption-based indicator of resource use, we find the contrary: Achievements in decoupling in advanced economies are smaller than reported or even nonexistent. We present a time series analysis of the MF of 186 countries and identify material flows associated with global production and consumption networks in unprecedented specificity. By calculating raw material equivalents of international trade, we demonstrate that countries' use of nondomestic resources is, on average, about threefold larger than the physical quantity of traded goods. As wealth grows, countries tend to reduce their domestic portion of materials extraction through international trade, whereas the overall mass of material consumption generally increases. With every 10% increase in gross domestic product, the average national MF increases by 6%. Our findings call into question the sole use of current resource productivity indicators in policy making and suggest the necessity of an additional focus on consumption-based accounting for natural resource use.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            [ 1 ] Institute of Social Ecology (SEC), Department of Economics and Social Sciences University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) Vienna Austria
            [ 2 ] German Environment Agency (UBA) Dessau‐Roßlau Germany
            [ 3 ] European Commission Directorate‐General Joint Research Centre Sustainable Resources Directorate Ispra Italy
            Author notes
            [* ] Address correspondence to: Gian Andrea Blengini, European Commission Directorate‐General Joint Research Centre Sustainable Resources Directorate, Unit D3 – Land Resources, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, Ispra, VA 21027, Italy. Email: gianandrea.blengini@ 123456ec.europa.eu
            Contributors
            ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7977-1363, gianandrea.blengini@ec.europa.eu
            Journal
            J Ind Ecol
            J Ind Ecol
            10.1111/(ISSN)1530-9290
            JIEC
            Journal of Industrial Ecology
            John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
            1088-1980
            1530-9290
            25 September 2018
            February 2019
            : 23
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/jiec.2019.23.issue-1 )
            : 62-76
            6472471
            10.1111/jiec.12809
            JIEC12809
            © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Industrial Ecology, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Yale University.

            This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            Counts
            Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Pages: 15, Words: 10573
            Product
            Funding
            Funded by: Austrian Science Fund
            Award ID: P27590
            Funded by: Joint Research Centre
            Award ID: CT‐EX2016D288092‐101‐1
            Categories
            Research and Analysis
            SPECIAL FEATURE ON DIGGING DEEPER INTO THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY
            Research and Analysis
            Custom metadata
            2.0
            jiec12809
            February 2019
            Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:03.04.2019

            Comments

            Comment on this article