29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Shining a Light on Dark Sequencing: Characterising Errors in Ion Torrent PGM Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) is a new sequencing platform that substantially differs from other sequencing technologies by measuring pH rather than light to detect polymerisation events. Using re-sequencing datasets, we comprehensively characterise the biases and errors introduced by the PGM at both the base and flow level, across a combination of factors, including chip density, sequencing kit, template species and machine. We found two distinct insertion/deletion (indel) error types that accounted for the majority of errors introduced by the PGM. The main error source was inaccurate flow-calls, which introduced indels at a raw rate of 2.84% (1.38% after quality clipping) using the OneTouch 200 bp kit. Inaccurate flow-calls typically resulted in over-called short-homopolymers and under-called long-homopolymers. Flow-call accuracy decreased with consecutive flow cycles, but we also found significant periodic fluctuations in the flow error-rate, corresponding to specific positions within the flow-cycle pattern. Another less common PGM error, high frequency indel (HFI) errors, are indels that occur at very high frequency in the reads relative to a given base position in the reference genome, but in the majority of instances were not replicated consistently across separate runs. HFI errors occur approximately once every thousand bases in the reference, and correspond to 0.06% of bases in reads. Currently, the PGM does not achieve the accuracy of competing light-based technologies. However, flow-call inaccuracy is systematic and the statistical models of flow-values developed here will enable PGM-specific bioinformatics approaches to be developed, which will account for these errors. HFI errors may prove more challenging to address, especially for polymorphism and amplicon applications, but may be overcome by sequencing the same DNA template across multiple chips.

          Author Summary

          DNA sequencing is used routinely within biology to reveal the genetic information of living organisms. In recent years, technological advances have led to the availability of high-throughput, low-cost DNA sequencing machines (‘sequencers’). In 2011, Life Sciences released a new sequencer, the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM). This is the first sequencer to measure changes in pH rather that emitted light to register sequencing reactions. Consequently, this unique technology is both cost-effective and advertised to have high accuracy, making it attractive for many laboratories. However, every sequencing technology introduces unique errors and biases into the resulting DNA sequences, and understanding PGM-specific characteristics is crucial to determining suitable applications for this new technology. We comprehensively examine the types of errors and biases in PGM-sequenced data across several experimental variables, including chip density, template kit, template DNA and across two machines. Using statistical approaches, we quantify the influence of experimental variables, as well as DNA sequence-specific effects, and find that the PGM has two types of technology-specific errors. We also find that the accuracy of the PGM is poorer than that of light-based technologies, and we make recommendations for this technology as well as provide statistical models for overcoming PGM sequencing errors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor
          Journal
          PLoS Comput Biol
          PLoS Comput. Biol
          plos
          ploscomp
          PLoS Computational Biology
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
          1553-734X
          1553-7358
          April 2013
          April 2013
          11 April 2013
          : 9
          : 4
          : e1003031
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
          [2 ]Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
          [3 ]CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
          [4 ]School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
          ETH Zurich, Switzerland
          Author notes

          The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

          Conceived and designed the experiments: LMB GWT. Performed the experiments: MKB. Analyzed the data: LMB GS. Wrote the paper: LMB PH GWT.

          Article
          PCOMPBIOL-D-12-01762
          10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003031
          3623719
          23592973
          0341b090-983c-4689-a9db-329379cca8e6
          Copyright @ 2013

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          History
          : 2 November 2012
          : 26 February 2013
          Page count
          Pages: 18
          Funding
          LMB was funded by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Transformational Biology Capability Platform. PH is supported by an ARC DORA fellowship. GWT is supported by an ARC Queen Elizabeth II fellowship (ARC-DP1093175). Work was also supported by strategic University of Queensland funding of the Australian Centre for Ecogenomics. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
          Categories
          Research Article
          Biology
          Computational Biology
          Genomics

          Quantitative & Systems biology
          Quantitative & Systems biology

          Comments

          Comment on this article