20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Design, Usability, and Feasibility of a Family-Focused Diabetes Self-Care Support mHealth Intervention for Diverse, Low-Income Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Family members' helpful and harmful actions affect adherence to self-care and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low socioeconomic status. Few family interventions for adults with T2D address harmful actions or use text messages to reach family members. Through user-centered design and iterative usability/feasibility testing, we developed a mHealth intervention for disadvantaged adults with T2D called FAMS. FAMS delivers phone coaching to set self-care goals and improve patient participant's (PP) ability to identify and address family actions that support/impede self-care. PPs receive text message support and can choose to invite a support person (SP) to receive text messages. We recruited 19 adults with T2D from three Federally Qualified Health Centers to use FAMS for two weeks and complete a feedback interview. Coach-reported data captured coaching success, technical data captured user engagement, and PP/SP interviews captured the FAMS experience. PPs were predominantly African American, 83% had incomes <$35,000, and 26% were married. Most SPs ( n = 7) were spouses/partners or adult children. PPs reported FAMS increased self-care and both PPs and SPs reported FAMS improved support for and communication about diabetes. FAMS is usable and feasible and appears to help patients manage self-care support, although some PPs may not have a SP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis.

          In a review of the literature from 1948 to 2001, 122 studies were found that correlated structural or functional social support with patient adherence to medical regimens. Meta-analyses establish significant average r-effect sizes between adherence and practical, emotional, and unidimensional social support; family cohesiveness and conflict; marital status; and living arrangement of adults. Substantive and methodological variables moderate these effects. Practical support bears the highest correlation with adherence. Adherence is 1.74 times higher in patients from cohesive families and 1.53 times lower in patients from families in conflict. Marital status and living with another person (for adults) increase adherence modestly. A research agenda is recommended to further examine mediators of the relationship between social support and health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis.

              To assess the effect of mobile phone intervention on glycaemic control in diabetes self-management. We searched three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) using the following terms: diabetes or diabetes mellitus and mobile phone or cellular phone, or text message. We also manually searched reference lists of relevant papers to identify additional studies. Clinical studies that used mobile phone intervention and reported changes in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) values in patients with diabetes were reviewed. The study design, intervention methods, sample size and clinical outcomes were extracted from each trial. The results of the HbA(1c) change in the trials were pooled using meta-analysis methods.   A total of 22 trials were selected for the review. Meta-analysis among 1657 participants showed that mobile phone interventions for diabetes self-management reduced HbA(1c) values by a mean of 0.5% [6 mmol/mol; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.7% (4-8 mmol/mol)] over a median of 6 months follow-up duration. In subgroup analysis, 11 studies among Type 2 diabetes patients reported significantly greater reduction in HbA(1c) than studies among Type 1 diabetes patients [0.8 (9 mmol/mol) vs. 0.3% (3 mmol/mol); P=0.02]. The effect of mobile phone intervention did not significantly differ by other participant characteristics or intervention strategies.   Results pooled from the included trials provided strong evidence that mobile phone intervention led to statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control and self-management in diabetes care, especially for Type 2 diabetes patients. © 2011 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2011 Diabetes UK.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Diabetes Res
                J Diabetes Res
                JDR
                Journal of Diabetes Research
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2314-6745
                2314-6753
                2016
                7 November 2016
                : 2016
                : 7586385
                Affiliations
                1Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
                2Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
                3Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                4Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
                Author notes
                *Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry: lindsay.mayberry@ 123456vanderbilt.edu

                Academic Editor: Shari Bolen

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-4151
                Article
                10.1155/2016/7586385
                5116505
                27891524
                03792930-16c6-4738-aa6a-6d02d817f8eb
                Copyright © 2016 Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 July 2016
                : 4 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
                Award ID: P30DK092986
                Award ID: K01DK106306
                Award ID: R01DK092939
                Award ID: DP3DK103999
                Award ID: K01DK087894
                Award ID: R01DK100694
                Funded by: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality
                Award ID: K12HS022990
                Funded by: National Center for Research Resources
                Award ID: UL1 RR024975-01
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
                Award ID: UL1 TR000445-06
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article