31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Political Economy of Populism

      1 , 2
      Journal of Economic Literature
      American Economic Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We synthesize the literature on the recent rise of populism. First, we discuss definitions and present descriptive evidence on the recent increase in support for populists. Second, we cover the historical evolution of populist regimes since the late nineteenth century. Third, we discuss the role of secular economic factors related to cross-border trade and automation. Fourth, we review studies on the role of the 2008–09 global financial crisis and subsequent austerity, connect them to historical work covering the Great Depression, and discuss likely mechanisms. Fifth, we discuss studies on identity politics, trust, and cultural backlash. Sixth, we discuss economic and cultural consequences of growth in immigration and the recent refugee crisis. We also discuss the gap between perceptions and reality regarding immigration. Seventh, we review studies on the impact of the internet and social media. Eighth, we discuss the literature on the implications of populism’s recent rise. We conclude outlining avenues for further research. (JEL D72, E32, G01, J15, N30, N40, Z13)

          Related collections

          Most cited references239

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The spread of true and false news online

          We investigated the differential diffusion of all of the verified true and false news stories distributed on Twitter from 2006 to 2017. The data comprise ~126,000 stories tweeted by ~3 million people more than 4.5 million times. We classified news as true or false using information from six independent fact-checking organizations that exhibited 95 to 98% agreement on the classifications. Falsehood diffused significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth in all categories of information, and the effects were more pronounced for false political news than for false news about terrorism, natural disasters, science, urban legends, or financial information. We found that false news was more novel than true news, which suggests that people were more likely to share novel information. Whereas false stories inspired fear, disgust, and surprise in replies, true stories inspired anticipation, sadness, joy, and trust. Contrary to conventional wisdom, robots accelerated the spread of true and false news at the same rate, implying that false news spreads more than the truth because humans, not robots, are more likely to spread it.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Conference Proceedings: not found

              Bowling alone

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Economic Literature
                Journal of Economic Literature
                American Economic Association
                0022-0515
                September 01 2022
                September 01 2022
                : 60
                : 3
                : 753-832
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Sciences Po, Paris, and CEPR.
                [2 ] London Business School and CEPR.
                Article
                10.1257/jel.20201595
                03af0af7-a9ff-4bd8-8cbd-2a83b1b640b0
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log