28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To assess the outcomes of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a modified supine position, more feasible for surgeons, anaesthetists, and operating theatre staff, as well as for the patient himself, and evaluating it in comparison to the standard prone position.

          Patient and methods

          A retrospective, case-control study was conducted between January 2011 and December 2015. In all, 197 patient’s records were reviewed. The initial 101 patients were operated upon in prone position. From mid-2013, 96 patients were operated upon in a complete supine, flank-free position. The groups were compared in terms of operation time, calculated from positioning the patient after anaesthesia induction, insertion of ureteric catheter, puncture of renal system, until the end of procedure; stone-free rate; hospital stay; and postoperative complications, such as transfusion rate, fever, and urinary leakage.

          Results

          There were two significant differences between the groups. Firstly, the operation time was a mean (SD) 32.3 (6.6) min shorter for the supine versus the prone position ( P < 0.001). Secondly, hospital stay was a mean (SD) 1.2 (0.75) days shorter for the supine vs the prone position ( P < 0.001). The complete stone clearance rate (85.4% for supine vs 79.2% for prone; P = 0.2) and postoperative complications (7.3% for supine vs 17.8% for prone; P = 0.02) were comparable in both groups.

          Conclusion

          Supine PCNL is a feasible procedure with similar outcomes in terms of stone-free rate as well as postoperative complications, to the standard prone PCNL. It reduces unnecessary delay that occurs during change of position resulting in significant shortening of the total operation time and surgeons can perform supine PCNL whilst sitting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position.

          Percutaneous nephroscopy is usually performed with the patient prone, which is uncomfortable for the patient and does not prevent damage to the colon. We assess the possibility of performing percutaneous nephroscopy using local anesthesia with the patient supine, and evaluate the advantages and complications. A total of 557 consecutive percutaneous nephroscopies were attempted in 221 men and 242 women in the supine position. Patient age ranged from 8 to 87 years (mean 55.1). Patients are supine with a 3 l. serum bag below the ipsilateral flank. We catheterize the affected uretheral meatus with a 5F catheter through a flexible cystoscope. The tract is infiltrated with local anesthesia. The skin is punctured in the posterior axillary line which corresponds to approximately 1 cm. above the bag. We use an Alken set to dilate the tract to 30F, which is the size of the Amplatz sheath we commonly use. Nephroscopy was performed in 519 cases (93.1%). Mean operation time was 85 minutes (range 15 to 240). Serious bleeding occurred in 3 cases. The colon was never damaged in patients treated in the supine position. Percutaneous nephroscopy using local anesthesia with the patient supine is safe and easy. According to our experience the advantages in comfort to the patient and feasibility to the surgeon justify its use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial.

              To compare operative time, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine versus prone position in a prospective randomized trial. From October 2005 to June 2007, 75 patients (33 men, 42 women; mean age, 39.3 yr) were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into group A (39 patients, supine position) and group B (36 patients, prone position). Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of single or multiple renal stones (pelvic-caliceal) treatable with a single percutaneous access, stone diameter >2.5cm, body mass index (BMI) <30kg/m(2), and no contraindications to perform the operation in the prone position. Exclusion criteria were stones in more than one calyx, complete staghorn stones, and coexisting renal anomalies. The two groups were comparable in age, BMI, male-to-female ratio, and stone size. No significant difference was ascertained between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate (group A, 88.7% vs. group B, 91.6%, p=0.12), mean blood loss (group A, Delta hemoglobin -2.3g/dl vs. group B, -2.2g/dl, p=0.23), and mean hospital stay (group A, 4.3 d vs. group B, 4.1 d, p=0.18). The only significant difference reported was mean operative time (group A, 43min vs. group B, 68min, p<0.001). No blood transfusions were needed and no organ injuries were reported. In this carefully selected patient population with uncomplicated renal stones, the supine position was similar to the prone position for percutaneous stone removal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arab J Urol
                Arab J Urol
                Arab Journal of Urology
                Elsevier
                2090-598X
                2090-5998
                31 October 2016
                March 2017
                31 October 2016
                : 15
                : 1
                : 42-47
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Alkhor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Urology, Alkhor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar. Fax: +974 44745691.Department of UrologyAlkhor HospitalHamad Medical CorporationP.O. Box 3050DohaQatar dr.nadeemsohail@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2090-598X(16)30073-0
                10.1016/j.aju.2016.10.001
                5329699
                28275517
                03ceb585-03ff-4bbc-a459-9689aa7326ea
                © 2016 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 August 2016
                : 21 September 2016
                : 5 October 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                bmi, body mass index,gmsv, galdakao-modified supine valdivia (position),pcnl, percutaneous nephrolithotomy,rirs, retrograde intrarenal surgery,renal stone,percutaneous nephrolithotomy,supine position,prone position,tubeless pcnl

                Comments

                Comment on this article