29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study

      research-article
      , ,
      BMC Oral Health
      BioMed Central
      Self-ligating brackets, Conventional brackets, EARR

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the apical root resorption seen after orthodontic treatment with the conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets.

          Methods

          Pre-treatment and post-treatment periapical radio-graphs of 70 patients, (35 treated with the Damon3 0.022” bracket and 35 with the 0.022” 3 M bracket) were studied. The long cone paralleling technique was used for all the radio-graphs. Any image distortion between the pre-treatment and post-treatment radio-graph was calculated and compensated for by using the crown length measurements, on the assumption that the crown length remains unaltered during the treatment period. Quantitative measurements of crown and root lengths for the maxillary and the mandibular central and lateral incisors were compared. Means and standard deviations for the percentage root resorption per tooth group were calculated. A paired t-test and non paired t-test analysis was performed to determine whether there was an appliance, treatment time, or initial age effect on the amount of root resorption seen after treatment.

          Result

          No statistically significant difference in root resorption between the two appliance systems was found. The patient’s degree of root resorption were graded as grade 1 and grade 2 in the self-ligating group which is more than the conventional group.

          Conclusions

          There was no significant difference in root resorption between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in severe crowding incisors subjects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.

          This systematic review evaluated root resorption as an outcome for patients who had orthodontic tooth movement. The results could provide the best available evidence for clinical decisions to minimize the risks and severity of root resorption. Electronic databases were searched, nonelectronic journals were hand searched, and experts in the field were consulted with no language restrictions. Study selection criteria included randomized clinical trials involving human subjects for orthodontic tooth movement, with fixed appliances, and root resorption recorded during or after treatment. Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from the selected studies on a standardized form. The searches retrieved 921 unique citations. Titles and abstracts identified 144 full articles from which 13 remained after the inclusion criteria were applied. Differences in the methodologic approaches and reporting results made quantitative statistical comparisons impossible. Evidence suggests that comprehensive orthodontic treatment causes increased incidence and severity of root resorption, and heavy forces might be particularly harmful. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption is unaffected by archwire sequencing, bracket prescription, and self-ligation. Previous trauma and tooth morphology are unlikely causative factors. There is some evidence that a 2 to 3 month pause in treatment decreases total root resorption. The results were inconclusive in the clinical management of root resorption, but there is evidence to support the use of light forces, especially with incisor intrusion. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of upper incisors.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors.

              The purpose of this study was to determine whether it would be possible to identify pretreatment factors that will allow the clinician to predict the incidence, location, and severity of root resorption before the commencement of orthodontic treatment. The records of 868 patients who were treated with full, fixed edgewise appliances were obtained from 6 private offices; full-mouth periapical radiographs were used to accurately assess apical root resorption from first molar to first molar in both arches. The results showed that resorption occurs primarily in the maxillary anterior teeth, averaging over 1.4 mm. The worst resorption was seen in maxillary lateral incisors and in teeth with abnormal root shape (pipette, pointed, or dilacerated). Adult patients experienced more resorption than children did in the mandibular anterior segment only. Asian patients were found to experience significantly less root resorption than white or Hispanic patients. Increased overjet, but not overbite, was significantly associated with greater root resorption. There was no difference in either the incidence or severity of root resorption between male and female patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                weiting163@163.com
                2102370568@qq.com
                +86-0577-88063012 , 156089794@qq.com
                Journal
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6831
                1 October 2015
                1 October 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 115
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Orthodontics, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang China
                [ ]School of international studies, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang China
                Article
                100
                10.1186/s12903-015-0100-0
                4590271
                03dffb23-90e5-4cad-b6af-d7791e3d034b
                © Chen et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 February 2015
                : 23 September 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Dentistry
                self-ligating brackets,conventional brackets,earr
                Dentistry
                self-ligating brackets, conventional brackets, earr

                Comments

                Comment on this article