8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Compensatory Control Account of Meritocracy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Why are people motivated to support social systems that claim to distribute resources based on hard work and effort, even when those systems seem unfair? Recent research on compensatory control shows that lowered perceptions of personal control motivate a greater endorsement of external systems (e.g., God, government) that compensate for a lack of personal control. The present studies demonstrate that U.S. citizens’ faith in a popular economic ideology, namely the belief that hard work guarantees success (i.e., meritocracy), similarly increases under conditions of decreased personal control. We found that a threat to personal control increased participants’ endorsement of meritocracy (Studies 1 and 2). Additionally, lowered perceptions of control led to increased feelings of anxiety regarding the future, but the subsequent endorsement of (Study 2) or exposure to (Study 3) meritocracy attenuated this effect. While the compensatory use of meritocracy may be a phenomenon unique to the United States of America, these studies provide important insight into the appeal and persistence of ideologies in general.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

            Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

              Hypotheses involving mediation are common in the behavioral sciences. Mediation exists when a predictor affects a dependent variable indirectly through at least one intervening variable, or mediator. Methods to assess mediation involving multiple simultaneous mediators have received little attention in the methodological literature despite a clear need. We provide an overview of simple and multiple mediation and explore three approaches that can be used to investigate indirect processes, as well as methods for contrasting two or more mediators within a single model. We present an illustrative example, assessing and contrasting potential mediators of the relationship between the helpfulness of socialization agents and job satisfaction. We also provide SAS and SPSS macros, as well as Mplus and LISREL syntax, to facilitate the use of these methods in applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JSPP
                J Soc Polit Psych
                Journal of Social and Political Psychology
                J. Soc. Polit. Psych.
                PsychOpen
                2195-3325
                01 December 2014
                : 2
                : 1
                : 313-334
                Affiliations
                [a ]Psychology Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
                [b ]Psychology Department, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
                [3]Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA
                [4]Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Psychology Department, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045-7556, United States of America. C.Goode@ 123456ku.edu
                Article
                jspp.v2i1.372
                10.5964/jspp.v2i1.372
                03fc5875-1ae4-420b-87b4-8a32237d9945
                Copyright @

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 May 2014
                : 26 September 2014
                Categories
                Original Research Reports

                Psychology
                ideology,system justification,social mobility,meritocracy,compensatory control
                Psychology
                ideology, system justification, social mobility, meritocracy, compensatory control

                Comments

                Comment on this article