28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Affective attention under cognitive load: reduced emotional biases but emergent anxiety-related costs to inhibitory control

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Trait anxiety is associated with deficits in attentional control, particularly in the ability to inhibit prepotent responses. Here, we investigated this effect while varying the level of cognitive load in a modified antisaccade task that employed emotional facial expressions (neutral, happy, and angry) as targets. Load was manipulated using a secondary auditory task requiring recognition of tones (low load), or recognition of specific tone pitch (high load). Results showed that load increased antisaccade latencies on trials where gaze toward face stimuli should be inhibited. This effect was exacerbated for high anxious individuals. Emotional expression also modulated task performance on antisaccade trials for both high and low anxious participants under low cognitive load, but did not influence performance under high load. Collectively, results (1) suggest that individuals reporting high levels of anxiety are particularly vulnerable to the effects of cognitive load on inhibition, and (2) support recent evidence that loading cognitive processes can reduce emotional influences on attention and cognition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

          A load theory of attention in which distractor rejection depends on the level and type of load involved in current processing was tested. A series of experiments demonstrates that whereas high perceptual load reduces distractor interference, working memory load or dual-task coordination load increases distractor interference. These findings suggest 2 selective attention mechanisms: a perceptual selection mechanism serving to reduce distractor perception in situations of high perceptual load that exhaust perceptual capacity in processing relevant stimuli and a cognitive control mechanism that reduces interference from perceived distractors as long as cognitive control functions are available to maintain current priorities (low cognitive load). This theory resolves the long-standing early versus late selection debate and clarifies the role of cognitive control in selective attention. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

            In 2 experiments the authors examined whether individual differences in working-memory (WM) capacity are related to attentional control. Experiment 1 tested high- and low-WM-span (high-span and low-span) participants in a prosaccade task, in which a visual cue appeared in the same location as a subsequent to-be-identified target letter, and in an antisaccade task, in which a target appeared opposite the cued location. Span groups identified targets equally well in the prosaccade task, reflecting equivalence in automatic orienting. However, low-span participants were slower and less accurate than high-span participants in the antisaccade task, reflecting differences in attentional control. Experiment 2 measured eye movements across a long antisaccade session. Low-span participants made slower and more erroneous saccades than did high-span participants. In both experiments, low-span participants performed poorly when task switching from antisaccade to prosaccade blocks. The findings support a controlled-attention view of WM capacity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

              The hypothesis that working memory is crucial for reducing distraction by maintaining the prioritization of relevant information was tested in neuroimaging and psychological experiments with humans. Participants performed a selective attention task that required them to ignore distractor faces while holding in working memory a sequence of digits that were in the same order (low memory load) or a different order (high memory load) on every trial. Higher memory load, associated with increased prefrontal activity, resulted in greater interference effects on behavioral performance from the distractor faces, plus increased face-related activity in the visual cortex. These findings confirm a major role for working memory in the control of visual selective attention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                13 May 2013
                2013
                : 7
                : 188
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London London, UK
                [2] 2St Johns College Research Centre, St Johns College, University of Oxford Oxford, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Luiz Pessoa, University of Maryland, USA

                Reviewed by: Katherine E. Vytal, National Institutes of Health, USA; Carien Van Reekum, University of Reading, UK

                *Correspondence: Nick Berggren, Anne Richards and Nazanin Derakshan, Affective and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. e-mail: nbergg01@ 123456mail.bbk.ac.uk ; a.richards@ 123456bbk.ac.uk ; n.derakhshan@ 123456bbk.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2013.00188
                3652291
                23717273
                04128aed-f81a-4c37-bfb2-11f31fc10e98
                Copyright © 2013 Berggren, Richards, Taylor and Derakshan.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 15 January 2013
                : 24 April 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 49, Pages: 7, Words: 7014
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research Article

                Neurosciences
                cognitive load,trait anxiety,threat processing,visual attention,antisaccade task
                Neurosciences
                cognitive load, trait anxiety, threat processing, visual attention, antisaccade task

                Comments

                Comment on this article