13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relative Roles of Race Versus Socioeconomic Position in Studies of Health Inequalities: A Matter of Interpretation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An abundance of research has documented health inequalities by race and socioeconomic position (SEP) in the United States. However, conceptual and methodological challenges complicate the interpretation of study findings, thereby limiting progress in understanding health inequalities and in achieving health equity. Fundamental to these challenges is a lack of clarity about what race is and the implications of that ambiguity for scientific inquiry. Additionally, there is wide variability in how SEP is conceptualized and measured, resulting in a lack of comparability across studies and significant misclassification of risk. The objectives of this review are to synthesize the literature regarding common approaches to examining race and SEP health inequalities and to discuss the conceptual and methodological challenges associated with how race and SEP have been employed in public health research. Addressing health inequalities has become increasingly important as the United States trends toward becoming a majority-minority nation. Recommendations for future research are presented.

          Related collections

          Most cited references150

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

          In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health.

              Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that posits that multiple social categories (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status) intersect at the micro level of individual experience to reflect multiple interlocking systems of privilege and oppression at the macro, social-structural level (e.g., racism, sexism, heterosexism). Public health's commitment to social justice makes it a natural fit with intersectionality's focus on multiple historically oppressed populations. Yet despite a plethora of research focused on these populations, public health studies that reflect intersectionality in their theoretical frameworks, designs, analyses, or interpretations are rare. Accordingly, I describe the history and central tenets of intersectionality, address some theoretical and methodological challenges, and highlight the benefits of intersectionality for public health theory, research, and policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                8006431
                1309
                Annu Rev Public Health
                Annu Rev Public Health
                Annual review of public health
                0163-7525
                1545-2093
                19 March 2023
                01 April 2018
                12 January 2018
                27 March 2023
                : 39
                : 169-188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
                [2 ]Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
                [3 ]Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
                [4 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                NIHMS1876758
                10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014230
                10042447
                29328880
                042c22d3-5654-4fc7-b138-22b30541d10e

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See credit lines of images or other third-party material in this article for license information

                History
                Categories
                Article

                race,socioeconomic position,socioeconomic status,health inequalities,social epidemiology,social determinants of health

                Comments

                Comment on this article