1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patient and Public involvement (PPI) in health care occupies a central place in Western democracies. In England, this theme has been continuously prominent since the introduction of market reforms in the early 1990s. The health care reforms implemented by the current Coalition Government are making primary care practitioners the main commissioners of health care services in the National Health Service, and a duty is placed on them to involve the public in commissioning decisions and strategies. Since implementation of PPI initiatives in primary care commissioning is not new, we asked how likely it is that the new reforms will make a difference. We scanned the main literature related to primary care-led commissioning and found little evidence of effective PPI thus far. We suggest that unless the scope and intended objectives of PPI are clarified and appropriate resources are devoted to it, PPI will continue to remain empty rhetoric and box ticking.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Prim Health Care Res Dev
          Primary health care research & development
          Cambridge University Press (CUP)
          1477-1128
          1463-4236
          May 2015
          : 16
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 1Health Services Research and Policy Department,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,London,UK.
          [2 ] 2Centre for Health Services Studies,University of Kent,Kent,UK.
          [3 ] 3Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care,University of Hertfordshire,Hertfordshire,UK.
          [4 ] 4Centre for Health Services Studies,University of Kent,Kent,UK.
          Article
          S1463423614000486
          10.1017/S1463423614000486
          25482225
          042f53f7-2c24-4ba0-b67e-b458162fe222
          History

          community participation,user involvement,public involvement,health policy,commissioning,NHS,England

          Comments

          Comment on this article