4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Five-Year Trend in Issuing Disability Certificates from a General Hospital Psychiatric Unit in South India

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Mental disability is a common condition but is considered as an invisible disability. The disability certificate in psychiatry remains underexplored. Some reasons are issues of confidentiality, stigma, lack of awareness in the public, and the hesitancy in the mental health professionals. We aim to provide a brief profile of patients with mental illness issued disability certificates from a psychiatric unit over a five-year period (2013–2017).

          Methods:

          Our retrospective study is based on the data available from the copies of the issued disability certificates from a psychiatric unit that functions in a multispecialty tertiary care teaching government hospital in Southern India. Patients undergoing treatment in psychiatry apply for a disability certificate to the medical superintendent of the hospital. Each applicant undergoes a detailed workup to ascertain the diagnosis, and the mental disability is assessed using Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS). Those with intellectual developmental disorder (IDD) are assessed by a clinical psychologist for quantifying intelligence quotient, based on which the disability certificate is issued. Data were extracted and analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics were used.

          Results:

          Over five years, 258 disability certificates were issued. A total of 218 were for mental illness and 40 were for IDD. Schizophrenia was the commonest primary diagnosis. There was no gender predominance, nor the influence of gender on different domains of IDEAS except on work domain dysfunction due to mental illness. The validity period was not mentioned in 81% of the issued certificates for mental illness.

          Conclusions:

          This descriptive study found a lower number of certificates issued from the psychiatric unit. Schizophrenia remains the main psychiatric diagnosis for which a disability certificate was issued. We did not assess the utilization pattern of the issued certificates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          India’s disability estimates: Limitations and way forward

          Background With India preparing for the next decennial Census in 2021, we compared the disability estimates and data collection methodology between the Census 2011 and the most recent population-level survey for India and its states, to highlight the issues to be addressed to improve robustness of the disability estimates in the upcoming Census. Methods Data from the Census 2011 and from two complementary nationally representative household surveys that covered all Indian states with the same methodology and survey instruments–the District-Level Household Survey-4 (DLHS-4, 2012–2013) and the Annual Health Surveys (AHS three rounds, 2010–11, 2011–12 and 2012–13) were used. Data from DLHS-4 and AHS 2012–13 round were pooled to generate estimates for the year 2012–13. Data collection methodology between the sources was compared, including the review of definitions of each type of disability. The overall, mental, visual, hearing, speech, and movement disability rate (DR) per 100,000 population were compared between the sources for India and for each state, and the percent difference in the respective rates was calculated. We explored the reliability of these estimates comparing yearly data from the AHS for three successive rounds. Results Survey data were collected through proxy reporting, however, it is not entirely clear whether the data were proxy- or self-reported or a mix of both in the Census. The overall DR was 25.1% higher in the Census (2,242; 95% CI 2,241–2,243) than the survey (1,791; 95% CI 1,786–1,797) per 100,000 population, with the state-level difference ranging from -64% in Tamil Nadu to 107% in Sikkim state. Despite both sources using nearly similar definitions for overall disability and disability by type, the difference in DR was 125.5%, 54.2%, -25.7%, -19.7%, and 21.9% for hearing, speech, mental, movement, and visual DR, respectively. At the state-level, the difference in disability-specific estimates ranged from -84% to 450%. The extent of variations in the disability-specific estimates in AHS successive rounds ranged from -25% to 929% at the state-level. Conclusions There is momentum globally towards building disability measurement that is consistent with the data required for monitoring of the Sustainable Development Goals to ensure robust estimation of disability. The current estimates from the Census and surveys seem much lower than would be expected at the population level. We make recommendations that India needs to take serious note of in order to improve the validity and reliability of India’s disability estimates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Trends of utilization of government disability benefits among chronic mentally ill

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              A study of profile of disability certificate seeking patients with schizophrenia over a 5 year period

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Psychol Med
                Indian J Psychol Med
                SZJ
                spszj
                Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage India: New Delhi, India )
                0253-7176
                0975-1564
                25 August 2020
                September 2020
                : 42
                : 5
                : 451-455
                Affiliations
                [1 ] College of Nursing, JIPMER, Dhanvantari Nagar, Pondicherry, India.
                [2 ] Dept. of Psychiatry, JIPMER, Dhanvantari Nagar, Pondicherry, India.
                Author notes
                [*]Shivanand Kattimani, Dept. of Psychiatry, JIPMER, Dhanvantari Nagar, Gorimedu, Pondicherry 605006, India. E-mail: drshivanand@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.1177_0253717620947163
                10.1177/0253717620947163
                7750839
                33414592
                04371efd-bade-423c-a30a-aea2c0c278bf
                © 2020 Indian Psychiatric Society - South Zonal Branch

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 13 January 2020
                : 5 May 2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                ts7
                September 2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                mental illness,intellectual developmental disorder,disability,evaluation,certification,policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article