25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Body Composition in Health and Disease Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): A Critical Overview

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The measurement of body composition (BC) represents a valuable tool to assess nutritional status in health and disease. The most used methods to evaluate BC in the clinical practice are based on bicompartment models and measure, directly or indirectly, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (nowadays considered as the reference technique in clinical practice) are extensively used in epidemiological (mainly BIA) and clinical (mainly DXA) settings to evaluate BC. DXA is primarily used for the measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) and density to assess bone health and diagnose osteoporosis in defined anatomical regions (femur and spine). However, total body DXA scans are used to derive a three-compartment BC model, including BMC, FM, and FFM. Both these methods feature some limitations: the accuracy of BIA measurements is reduced when specific predictive equations and standardized measurement protocols are not utilized whereas the limitations of DXA are the safety of repeated measurements (no more than two body scans per year are currently advised), cost, and technical expertise. This review aims to provide useful insights mostly into the use of BC methods in prevention and clinical practice (ambulatory or bedridden patients). We believe that it will stimulate a discussion on the topic and reinvigorate the crucial role of BC evaluation in diagnostic and clinical investigation protocols.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition.

            Bone mineral density (BMD) and soft-tissue composition of the total body and major subregions were measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Total body scans were made in 12 young adults (6 male, 6 female) on five occasions at both a medium speed (20 min) and a fast speed (10 min). There were no significant differences in mean results or in precision errors between the two speeds. The precision errors (1 SD) for total body BMD, percent fat in soft tissue (% Fat), fat mass, and lean tissue mass were less than 0.01 g/cm2, 1.4%, 1.0 kg, and 0.8 kg, respectively. These results corresponded to a relative error of 0.8% for total body BMD and 1.5% for lean body mass. Regional BMD and soft-tissue values (arms, legs, trunk) were determined with slightly higher precision errors. Skeletal mineral was 5.8 +/- 0.5% of lean tissue mass (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001). DEXA provides precise composition analysis with a low radiation exposure (less than 0.1 microGy).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Norms and correlates of bioimpedance phase angle in healthy human subjects, hospitalized patients, and patients with liver cirrhosis.

              This study investigates whether bioimpedance indexes rather than derived body compartments would be adequate for nutritional assessment. Evidence is provided that the phase angle as determined by conventional tetrapolar whole body bioelectrical impedance analysis at 50 kHz (1) was largely determined by the arms and legs and not the trunk, (2) was higher in control subjects than in hospitalized patients [mean (SD) 6.6 degrees (0.6) degrees vs 4.9 degrees (1.2) degrees, P<0.001], (3) discriminated poorly between cirrhotic patients of different Child-Pugh class, and (4) was positively correlated with muscle mass ( r=0.53) and muscle strength ( r=0.53) in these patients (each P<0.01). In a prospective study of patients with liver cirrhosis Kaplan-Meier and log rank analyses of survival curves demonstrated that patients with phase angles equal to or less than 5.4 degrees had shorter survival times than patients with higher phase angles [6.6 degrees (1.4) degrees ] and that phase angles less than 4.4 degrees were associated with even shorter survival times ( P<0.01). The prognostic roles of the phase angle and standard nutritional parameters such as total body potassium, anthropometric measurements, and impedance derived fat free mass, body cell mass and fat mass were evaluated separately by Cox regression which eliminated all variables except the phase angle as predictors of patient survival time ( P<0.01). We concluded that for the clinical assessment of patients the phase angle may be superior to commonly used body composition information.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Contrast Media Mol Imaging
                Contrast Media Mol Imaging
                CMMI
                Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
                Hindawi
                1555-4309
                1555-4317
                2019
                29 May 2019
                : 2019
                : 3548284
                Affiliations
                1Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
                2Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomic, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy
                3Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine and School of Sports Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
                4Scientific Institute of Research and Scientific Institute of Research and Care, San Raffaele, Pisana, Italy
                5Human Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle on Tyne, UK
                6Pediatric Unit, Verona University Medical School, Verona, Italy
                7Sapienza University of Rome, Experimental Medicine Department, Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, Food Science and Human Nutrition Research Unit, Rome, Italy
                8Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatologic Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
                9Interuniversity Centre for Obesity and Eating Disorders (CISRODCA), Federico II University of Naples, Italy
                Author notes

                Guest Editor: Nicola Toschi

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6524-4493
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-4754
                Article
                10.1155/2019/3548284
                6560329
                31275083
                044d16d4-3873-42f7-a597-06af7c2ff713
                Copyright © 2019 Maurizio Marra et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 March 2019
                : 5 May 2019
                Categories
                Review Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article