84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is the effect of a combined physical activity and fall prevention intervention enhanced with health coaching and pedometers on older adults’ physical activity levels and mobility-related goals?: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Physical inactivity and falls in older people are important public health problems. Health conditions that could be ameliorated with physical activity are particularly common in older people. One in three people aged 65 years and over fall at least once annually, often resulting in significant injuries and ongoing disability. These problems need to be urgently addressed as the population proportion of older people is rapidly rising. This trial aims to establish the impact of a combined physical activity and fall prevention intervention compared to an advice brochure on objectively measured physical activity participation and mobility-related goal attainment among people aged 60 +.

          Methods/design

          A randomised controlled trial involving 130 consenting community-dwelling older people will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to a control group (n = 65) and receive a fall prevention brochure, or to an intervention group (n = 65) and receive the brochure plus physical activity promotion and fall prevention intervention enhanced with health coaching and a pedometer.

          Primary outcomes will be objectively measured physical activity and mobility-related goal attainment, measured at both six and 12 months post randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: falls, the proportion of people meeting the physical activity guidelines, quality of life, fear of falling, mood, and mobility limitation. Barriers and enablers to physical activity participation will be measured 6 months after randomisation.

          General linear models will be used to assess the effect of group allocation on the continuously-scored primary and secondary outcome measures, after adjusting for baseline scores. Between-group differences in goal attainment (primary outcome) will be analysed with ordinal regression. The number of falls per person-year will be analysed using negative binomial regression models to estimate the between-group difference in fall rates after one year (secondary outcome). Modified Poisson regression models will compare groups on dichotomous outcome measures. Analyses will be pre-planned, conducted while masked to group allocation and will use an intention-to-treat approach.

          Discussion

          This trial will address a key gap in evidence regarding physical activity and fall prevention for older people and will evaluate a program that could be directly implemented within Australian health services.

          Trial registration

          ACTRN12614000016639, 7/01/2014.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated meta-analysis and best practice recommendations.

          This systematic review update includes 54 randomised controlled trials and confirms that exercise as a single intervention can prevent falls (pooled rate ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91). Meta-regression revealed programs that included balance training, contained a higher dose of exercise and did not include walking training to have the greatest effect on reducing falls. We therefore recommend that exercise for falls prevention should provide a moderate or high challenge to balance and be undertaken for at least 2 hours per week on an ongoing basis. Additionally, we recommend that: falls prevention exercise should target both the general community and those at high risk for falls; exercise may be undertaken in a group or home-based setting; strength and walking training may be included in addition to balance training but high risk individuals should not be prescribed brisk walking programs; and other health-related risk factors should also be addressed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of the incidental and planned activity questionnaire (IPEQ) for older people.

            There is a need for a measure of physical activity that assesses low, basic and high-intensity activities suitable for use in ageing research including falls prevention trials. This study performed a formal validation of the incidental and planned activity questionnaire (IPEQ) by investigating its overall structure and measurement properties. Cross-sectional survey. Community sample. 500 older people (mean age 77.4 years, SD 6.08). The IPEQ was administered as part of a longer assessment in two different postal self-completion formats; one for estimating physical activity during the past week (IPEQ-W) and one for estimating average weekly physical activity over the past 3 months (IPEQ-WA). Test-retest reliability was assessed by the re-administration of the instruments one week later in a subsample of 80 respondents. Both IPEQ versions had good measurement properties, but overall the IPEQ-WA performed better than the IPEQ-W. Rasch analyses indicated the IPEQ-WA had an excellent overall fit. Analysis of the internal structure supported the unidimensionality of the scale with an acceptable internal consistency. The content representation of the items revealed three categories (low, moderate and high levels of physical activity), with a good contribution of items by threshold. The IPEQ-WA had excellent test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.87) and was able to discriminate differences in physical activity levels between groups differentiated by sex, age and fall risk factors. The IPEQ has excellent psychometric properties and assesses the level of physical activity relating to both basic and more demanding activities. Further research is required to confirm sensitivity to change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Screening for dementia by telephone using the memory impairment screen.

              : To develop and assess telephone-based screening tests for dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease (AD). : A cross-sectional validation study nested within a longitudinal study of aging and dementia. : The Einstein Aging Study of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. : Three hundred elderly community volunteers living in Bronx County, 27 of whom were diagnosed with dementia based on in-person clinical evaluation. Of the 27 individuals with dementia, 18 had AD. : A telephone battery was administered that included the Memory Impairment Screen by telephone (MIS-T, a test of semantic memory), the Category Fluency Test (CF-T), and the Telephone Instrument for Cognitive Status (TICS). An in-person evaluation then followed that included a neurological examination, a neuropsychological battery, demographics, and medical history. : The telephone battery was well accepted. The MIS-T required 4 minutes; the CF-T, 3 minutes; and the TICS, 10 minutes. The MIS-T had excellent sensitivity and specificity when compared with the CF-T and the TICS. Using cutscores on all three tests that provide a sensitivity of 78%, specificity was significantly higher for the MIS-T (93%) than for the CF-T (78%, P<.05) or the TICS (80%, P<.05). Combining the MIS-T and CF-T improved discriminative validity but increased screening time and the complexity of scoring. Normative data for the MIS-T, the CF-T, and the TICS for use in settings with different base rates (prevalence) of dementia are presented in this study. : The MIS-T outperforms the CF-T and the TICS as a valid and time-efficient telephone screen for dementia. For applications that require optimal efficiency and accuracy, the MIS-T is recommended.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                atiedemann@georgeinstitute.org.au
                SPaul@georgeinstitute.org.au
                bramsay@georgeinstitute.org.au
                sandra.orourke@sydney.edu.au
                kchamberlain@georgeinstitute.org.au
                ckirkham@georgeinstitute.org.au
                d.merom@uws.edu.au
                nikifairhall@gmail.com
                jsouza@georgeinstitute.org.au
                leanne.hassett@sydney.edu.au
                csherrington@georgeinstitute.org.au
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                9 May 2015
                9 May 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 477
                Affiliations
                [ ]The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
                [ ]The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
                [ ]Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Australia
                [ ]University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia
                Article
                1380
                10.1186/s12889-015-1380-7
                4429838
                25956926
                04673aa6-8e6b-4c45-acc6-8c0dba01a102
                © Tiedemann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 December 2014
                : 8 January 2015
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Public health
                physical activity,exercise,prevention,aged,health coaching,intervention studies,accidental falls,clinical trial,pedometer

                Comments

                Comment on this article