17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II

      ,
      Annales Geophysicae
      Copernicus GmbH

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The Earth's ionosphere is subject to disturbance from above (via solar variability and space-weather effects) and from below (such as tectonic activity, thunderstorms and sudden stratospheric warmings). Identifying the relative contribution of these effects remains challenging, despite recent advances in spacecraft monitoring near-Earth space. Man-made explosions provide a quantifiable proxy for natural terrestrial sources, enabling their impact on ionospheric variability to be studied. In this paper, the contribution of ground-based disturbances to ionospheric variability is investigated by considering the response of the ionospheric F2 layer over Slough, UK, to 152 major bombing raids over Europe during World War II, using a superposed epoch analysis. The median response of the F2 layer is a significant decrease in peak electron concentration ( ∼ 0.3<span class="thinspace"></span>MHz decrease in <i>fo</i>F2). This response is consistent with wave energy heating the thermosphere, enhancing the (temperature-dependent) loss rate of O<sup>+</sup> ions. The analysis was repeated for a range of thresholds in both time of bombing before the (noon) ionospheric measurement and tonnage of bombs dropped per raid. It was found that significant ( ∼ 2–3<i>σ</i>) deviations from the mean occurred for events occurring between approximately 3 and 7<span class="thinspace"></span>h ahead of the noon ionospheric measurements and for raids using a minimum of between 100 and 800<span class="thinspace"></span>t of high explosives. The most significant ionospheric response (2.99<i>σ</i>) occurred for 20 raids up to 5<span class="thinspace"></span>h before the ionospheric measurement, each with a minimum of 300<span class="thinspace"></span>t of explosives. To ensure that the observed ionospheric response cannot be attributable to space-weather sources, the analysis was restricted to those events for which the geomagnetic Ap index was less than 48 (Kp &amp;lt; 5). Digitisation of the early ionospheric data would enable the investigation into the response of additional ionospheric parameters (sporadic E, E and F1 layer heights and peak concentrations). One metric ton of TNT has an explosive energy of 4.184×10<sup>9</sup><span class="thinspace"></span>J, which is of the same order of energy as a cloud to ground lightning stroke. Since the occurrence of lightning has distinctive diurnal and seasonal cycles, it is feasible that a similar mechanism could contribute to the observed seasonal anomaly in ionospheric F-region electron concentrations. Further investigation, using less extreme examples, is required to determine the minimum explosive energy required to generate a detectable ionospheric response.</p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Physics and chemistry of the upper atmosphere

          M. H. Rees (1989)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Some Phenomena of Sunspots and of Terrestrial Magnetism at Kew Observatory

            C. CHREE (1913)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ionospheric response to earthquakes of different magnitudes: Larger quakes perturb the ionosphere stronger and longer

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annales Geophysicae
                Ann. Geophys.
                Copernicus GmbH
                1432-0576
                2018
                September 26 2018
                : 36
                : 5
                : 1243-1254
                Article
                10.5194/angeo-36-1243-2018
                04a31795-d2bd-48fb-8c74-cc7224c83576
                © 2018

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article