+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Luteal Metoclopramide-Induced Hyperprolactinemia on Pituitary and Luteal Responsiveness to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The pituitary and corpus luteum responses to acute gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administration at the mid-luteal phase (LP) were studied in 24 infertile women. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In one group (n = 12) metoclopramide (MCP, 10 mg orally 3 times daily) was administered from day 0 or 1 of the LP for 7 days. On day 7 or 8 of LP blood samples were taken every 15 min for 180 min; then 25 µg GnRH were acutely administered intravenously and blood samples taken at 185, 195, 210, 225, 240, 255, 270, 285 and 300 min. In the other 12 patients the same experimental design was performed on day 7 or 8 of an untreated LP. Plasma prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), progesterone and estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) were assayed. The responsiveness of the different hormones to GnRH was evaluated as the integrated secretory area for 120 min after injection (sISA = stimulated integrated secretory area) and as the percentage increase (ΔA) with respect to the area under basal conditions before GnRH administration (bISA = basal integrated secretory area). MCP-treated women showed higher basal PRL levels (p < 0.01) and lower basal plasma concentrations and bISA (p < 0.01) values of LH than controls. After GnRH a more marked response of LH secretion was observed in the treated group (p < 0.01), so that the absolute values of sISA were superimposable in both groups. Basal and stimulated FSH secretion did not differ significantly in the study groups. Basal plasma and bISA values of progesterone were also decreased in MCP-treated subjects. After GnRH injection the absolute values of progesterone sISA were greater in controls (p < 0.01), but ΔA values were similar in both groups. Basal and stimulated E<sub>2</sub> secretion was also superimposable in both groups. In conclusion, mild MCP-induced hyperprolactinemia during LP affects the hypothalamic-pituitary axis by a derangement of gonadotropin secretion which in turn determines a blunted functional activity of the corpus luteum.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Horm Res Paediatr
          Hormone Research in Paediatrics
          S. Karger AG
          02 December 2008
          : 31
          : 4
          : 169-174
          Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Cuore Catholic University, Rome, Italy
          181110 Horm Res 1989;31:169–174
          © 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 6
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article