9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The purpose of this study is to describe the volume, topics, and methodological nature of the existing research literature on research data management in academic institutions.

          Materials and methods

          We conducted a scoping review by searching forty literature databases encompassing a broad range of disciplines from inception to April 2016. We included all study types and data extracted on study design, discipline, data collection tools, and phase of the research data lifecycle.

          Results

          We included 301 articles plus 10 companion reports after screening 13,002 titles and abstracts and 654 full-text articles. Most articles (85%) were published from 2010 onwards and conducted within the sciences (86%). More than three-quarters of the articles (78%) reported methods that included interviews, cross-sectional, or case studies. Most articles (68%) included the Giving Access to Data phase of the UK Data Archive Research Data Lifecycle that examines activities such as sharing data. When studies were grouped into five dominant groupings (Stakeholder, Data, Library, Tool/Device, and Publication), data quality emerged as an integral element.

          Conclusion

          Most studies relied on self-reports (interviews, surveys) or accounts from an observer (case studies) and we found few studies that collected empirical evidence on activities amongst data producers, particularly those examining the impact of research data management interventions. As well, fewer studies examined research data management at the early phases of research projects. The quality of all research outputs needs attention, from the application of best practices in research data management studies, to data producers depositing data in repositories for long-term use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          New evidence pyramid

          A pyramid has expressed the idea of hierarchy of medical evidence for so long, that not all evidence is the same. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been placed at the top of this pyramid for several good reasons. However, there are several counterarguments to this placement. We suggest another way of looking at the evidence-based medicine pyramid and explain how systematic reviews and meta-analyses are tools for consuming evidence—that is, appraising, synthesising and applying evidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age.

            Policies ensuring that research data are available on public archives are increasingly being implemented at the government [1], funding agency [2-4], and journal [5, 6] level. These policies are predicated on the idea that authors are poor stewards of their data, particularly over the long term [7], and indeed many studies have found that authors are often unable or unwilling to share their data [8-11]. However, there are no systematic estimates of how the availability of research data changes with time since publication. We therefore requested data sets from a relatively homogenous set of 516 articles published between 2 and 22 years ago, and found that availability of the data was strongly affected by article age. For papers where the authors gave the status of their data, the odds of a data set being extant fell by 17% per year. In addition, the odds that we could find a working e-mail address for the first, last, or corresponding author fell by 7% per year. Our results reinforce the notion that, in the long term, research data cannot be reliably preserved by individual researchers, and further demonstrate the urgent need for policies mandating data sharing via public archives. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Smoke Alarm Ownership and Function

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 May 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 5
                : e0178261
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Gibson D. Lewis Health Science Library, UNT Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America
                [4 ]St. Michael’s Hospital Library, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Engineering & Computer Science Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]Map and Data Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]MacOdrum Library, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                International Nutrition Inc, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: LP.

                • Data curation: LP EB HM.

                • Formal analysis: LP EB.

                • Investigation: LP EB HM APA DD TK DL MT LT RR.

                • Methodology: LP.

                • Project administration: LP.

                • Supervision: LP.

                • Validation: LP HM.

                • Writing – original draft: LP.

                • Writing – review & editing: LP EB HM APA DD DL TK MT LT RR.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-7129
                Article
                PONE-D-17-07881
                10.1371/journal.pone.0178261
                5441653
                28542450
                04ea4b2d-ddfd-43f8-ba58-76f0aed08fdd
                © 2017 Perrier et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 February 2017
                : 26 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 14
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Database Searching
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research Validity
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Information Technology
                Data Processing
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Science Policy
                Research Integrity
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Librarians
                Custom metadata
                Dataset is available from the Zenodo Repository, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.557043.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article