10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of two methods for predicting equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) using true eKt/V value.

      Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany)
      Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, therapy, Kinetics, Male, Methods, Models, Theoretical, Renal Dialysis, Urea, metabolism

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two methods have been suggested by Daugirdas and Schneditz (the rate equation), and Smye for predicting true equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) without the need for obtaining a blood sample 60 min after hemodialysis (HD). We compared the accuracy of these two methods when applied to pediatric HD. Thirty-eight standard pediatric HD sessions in 15 patients, (6 male, 9 female), aged 14.5+/-3.3 years, were analyzed. Kt/V was calculated by formal variable-volume single-pool urea kinetic model with post-HD urea taken at the end of HD (single-pool Kt/V), and with equilibrated urea (Ceq) taken 60 min after the end of HD (eKt/V). eKt/V was predicted by the rate equation from single-pool Kt/V and by the Smye method from predicted Ceq. Mean values obtained by both the rate equation (1.44+/-0.32, P>0.05) and by the Smye method (1.47+/-0.36, P>0.05) were similar to eKt/V (1.42+/-0.30), but correlation between results from the rate equation and eKt/V (r=0.863) was higher than between those from the Smye method and eKt/V (r=0.654). Average absolute error of the rate equation in predicting eKt/V was 0.118+/-0.114 (median 0.095) Kt/V units and 8.53%+/-8.36% (median 6.29%), while for the Smye method it was significantly higher [0.221+/-0.180 (median 0.190) Kt/V units, P=0.001; 16.49%+/-15.98% (median 11.88%) P=0.004]. High correlation between eKt/V and results from the rate equation indicates that urea rebound (expressed as delta Kt/V) is a function of the rate of dialysis (K/V). To test this, we analyzed the relationship of K/V and other parameters (session duration, body mass index, ultrafiltration rate, blood flow, and urea distribution volume) with delta Kt/V. The only significant (P<0.01) and highest correlation (r=0.442) was found for K/V. We conclude that in children on chronic HD, the rate equation is a better predictor of eKt/V than the Smye method, and that HD efficiency is the strongest determinant of postdialysis urea rebound in children.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          10412862
          10.1007/s004670050632

          Chemistry
          Adolescent,Adult,Child,Female,Humans,Kidney Failure, Chronic,therapy,Kinetics,Male,Methods,Models, Theoretical,Renal Dialysis,Urea,metabolism

          Comments

          Comment on this article