6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The number of specialist anaesthetists in most low-income and middle-income countries is below what is needed to provide a safe quality anaesthesia service. There are no estimates of the optimal number; therefore, we estimated the minimum density of specialist anaesthetists to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare as indicated by the maternal mortality ratio (MMR).

          Methods

          Utilising existing country-level data of the number of physician anaesthesia providers (PAPs), MMR and Human Development Index (HDI), we developed best-fit curves to describe the relationship between MMR and PAPs, controlling for HDI. The aim was to use this relationship to estimate the number of PAPs associated with achieving the median MMR.

          Results

          We estimated that, in order to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare, as indicated by the global median MMR, countries should aim to have at least four PAPs per 100 000 population. Existing data show that currently 80 countries have fewer than this number.

          Conclusion

          Four PAPs per 100 000 population is a modest target, but there is a need to increase training of doctors in many countries in order to train more specialist anaesthetists. It is important that this target is considered during the development of national workforce plans, even if a stepwise approach to workforce planning is chosen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The WFSA Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey

          Safe anesthesia and surgical care are not available when needed for 5 billion of the world's 7 billion people. There are major deficiencies in the specialist surgical workforce in many parts of the world, and specific data on the anesthesia workforce are lacking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development of a Unifying Target and Consensus Indicators for Global Surgical Systems Strengthening: Proposed by the Global Alliance for Surgery, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care (The G4 Alliance)

            After decades on the margins of primary health care, surgical and anaesthesia care is gaining increasing priority within the global development arena. The 2015 publications of the Disease Control Priorities third edition on Essential Surgery and the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery created a compelling evidenced-based argument for the fundamental role of surgery and anaesthesia within cost-effective health systems strengthening global strategy. The launch of the Global Alliance for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care in 2015 has further coordinated efforts to build priority for surgical care and anaesthesia. These combined efforts culminated in the approval of a World Health Assembly resolution recognizing the role of surgical care and anaesthesia as part of universal health coverage. Momentum gained from these milestones highlights the need to identify consensus goals, targets and indicators to guide policy implementation and track progress at the national level. Through an open consultative process that incorporated input from stakeholders from around the globe, a global target calling for safe surgical and anaesthesia care for 80% of the world by 2030 was proposed. In order to achieve this target, we also propose 15 consensus indicators that build on existing surgical systems metrics and expand the ability to prioritize surgical systems strengthening around the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Identifying and exploring factors influencing career choice, recruitment and retention of anaesthesia trainees in the UK

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2018
                1 December 2018
                : 3
                : 6
                : e001005
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentMedical Research Council/Wits University Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand School of Public Health , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [2 ] departmentInstitute for Allied Health Research , University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Anaesthesia , University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex , Freetown, Sierra Leone
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Anaesthesiology , University of Port Harcourt , Port Harcourt, Nigeria
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Anaesthesia , University of Otago, Christchurch Hospital , Christchurch, New Zealand
                [6 ] World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Justine I Davies; justine.davies.6@ 123456bham.ac.uk
                Article
                bmjgh-2018-001005
                10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001005
                6278919
                04f2c5c2-94fe-4cc8-83b1-6cb6232f2b1d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

                History
                : 10 June 2018
                : 17 September 2018
                : 06 October 2018
                Categories
                Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                anaesthesia,global health,global surgery
                anaesthesia, global health, global surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article