20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Adalimumab Is Associated With Better Long-term Outcomes Compared With Standard of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims

          Therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] has proven to be effective for optimising anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Nevertheless, the majority of data refer to infliximab and reactive testing or association studies. We aimed to compare the long-term outcome of patients with IBD who received at least one proactive TDM of adalimumab, with standard of care, defined as empirical dose escalation and/or reactive TDM.

          Methods

          This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients on maintenance adalimumab therapy from June 2006 to December 2015 were eligible. We analysed time to treatment failure from start of adalimumab until the end of follow-up [July 2016]. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation for secondary loss of response or serious adverse event or need for IBD-related surgery. Serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies to adalimumab were measured using the Prometheus homogeneous mobility shift assay.

          Results

          A total of 382 patients with IBD [Crohn’s disease, n = 311, 81%] were included and received either at least one proactive TDM [n = 53] or standard of care [empirical dose escalation, n = 279; reactive TDM, n = 50]. Patients were followed for a median of 3.1 years [interquartile range, 1.4–4.8 years]. Multiple Cox regression analyses showed that at least one proactive TDM was independently associated with a reduced risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2–0.9; p = 0.022).

          Conclusions

          This multicentre, retrospective cohort study reflecting real-life clinical practice provides the first evidence that proactive TDM of adalimumab may be associated with a lower risk of treatment failure compared with standard of care in patients with IBD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Review article: loss of response to anti-TNF treatments in Crohn's disease.

          Loss of response to anti-TNF agents in Crohn's disease is an emerging clinical problem.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between pharmacokinetics of adalimumab and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

              Little is known about the association between pharmacokinetic features of adalimumab and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1873-9946
                1876-4479
                August 2019
                August 14 2019
                January 21 2019
                August 2019
                August 14 2019
                January 21 2019
                : 13
                : 8
                : 976-981
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
                Article
                10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz018
                6939875
                30689771
                04f3ac23-3d1f-4503-9701-cd1837c5f603
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article