41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Molecular mechanisms of translational control

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Translational regulation can be global or mRNA specific, and most examples of translational regulation that have been described so far affect the rate-limiting initiation step.

          • Global control of translation is frequently exerted by regulating the phosphorylation or availability of initiation factors. Two of the most well-known examples are the regulation of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E availability by 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), and the modulation of the levels of active ternary complex by eIF2α phosphorylation.

          • mRNA-specific translational control is driven by RNA sequences and/or structures that are commonly located in the untranslated regions of the transcript. These features are usually recognized by regulatory proteins or micro RNAs (miRNAs).

          • Quasi-circularization of mRNAs can be mediated by the cap structure and the poly(A) tail via the eIF4E–eIF4G–polyA-binding-protein (PABP) interaction. Such interactions between the 5′ and the 3′ ends of mRNAs could provide a spatial framework for the action of regulatory factors that bind to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR). However, other forms of 5′–3′-end interactions are likely to occur as well.

          • Many regulatory proteins target the stable association of the small ribosomal subunit with the mRNA. These factors function by steric hindrance (for example, iron-regulatory protein; IRP), by interfering with the eIF4F complex (for example, Maskin, Bicoid, Cup) or by as-yet-unknown, distinct mechanisms to control translation initiation (sex-lethal; SXL).

          • Other regulatory molecules modulate the joining of the large ribosomal subunit (hnRNP K and E1) or, potentially, post-initiation translation steps (miRNAs).

          • General translation factors can regulate the expression of specific mRNAs. An illustrative example is the stimulation of translation of the mRNA that encodes the GCN4 transcriptional activator by eIF2α phosphorylation.

          Abstract

          Translational control is widely used to regulate gene expression. This mode of regulation is especially relevant in situations where transcription is silent or when local control over protein accumulation is required. Although many examples of translational regulation have been described, only a few are beginning to be mechanistically understood. Instead of providing a comprehensive account of the examples that are known at present, we discuss instructive cases that serve as paradigms for different modes of translational control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans.

          During C. elegans development, the temporal pattern of many cell lineages is specified by graded activity of the heterochronic gene Lin-14. Here we demonstrate that a temporal gradient in Lin-14 protein is generated posttranscriptionally by multiple elements in the lin-14 3'UTR that are regulated by the heterochronic gene Lin-4. The lin-14 3'UTR is both necessary and sufficient to confer lin-4-mediated posttranscriptional temporal regulation. The function of the lin-14 3'UTR is conserved between C. elegans and C. briggsae. Among the conserved sequences are seven elements that are each complementary to the lin-4 RNAs. A reporter gene bearing three of these elements shows partial temporal gradient activity. These data suggest a molecular mechanism for Lin-14p temporal gradient formation: the lin-4 RNAs base pair to sites in the lin-14 3'UTR to form multiple RNA duplexes that down-regulate lin-14 translation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing.

            RNAi is a gene-silencing phenomenon triggered by double-stranded (ds) RNA and involves the generation of 21 to 26 nt RNA segments that guide mRNA destruction. In Caenorhabditis elegans, lin-4 and let-7 encode small temporal RNAs (stRNAs) of 22 nt that regulate stage-specific development. Here we show that inactivation of genes related to RNAi pathway genes, a homolog of Drosophila Dicer (dcr-1), and two homologs of rde-1 (alg-1 and alg-2), cause heterochronic phenotypes similar to lin-4 and let-7 mutations. Further we show that dcr-1, alg-1, and alg-2 are necessary for the maturation and activity of the lin-4 and let-7 stRNAs. Our findings suggest that a common processing machinery generates guide RNAs that mediate both RNAi and endogenous gene regulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans.

              Double-stranded RNAs can suppress expression of homologous genes through an evolutionarily conserved process named RNA interference (RNAi) or post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS). One mechanism underlying silencing is degradation of target mRNAs by an RNP complex, which contains approximately 22 nt of siRNAs as guides to substrate selection. A bidentate nuclease called Dicer has been implicated as the protein responsible for siRNA production. Here we characterize the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of Dicer (K12H4.8; dcr-1) in vivo and in vitro. dcr-1 mutants show a defect in RNAi. Furthermore, a combination of phenotypic abnormalities and RNA analysis suggests a role for dcr-1 in a regulatory pathway comprised of small temporal RNA (let-7) and its target (e.g., lin-41).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fatima.gebauer@crg.es
                hentze@embl.de
                Journal
                Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
                Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol
                Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1471-0072
                1471-0080
                2004
                : 5
                : 10
                : 827-835
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11478.3b, Centre de Regulació Genómica, Passeig Marítim 37–49, ; Barcelona, 08003 Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.4709.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0495 846X, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, ; Heidelberg, D-69117 Germany
                Article
                BFnrm1488
                10.1038/nrm1488
                7097087
                15459663
                04f7c73a-7b81-450d-be45-a2bf4ab18246
                © Nature Publishing Group 2004

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2004

                Comments

                Comment on this article